2011
DOI: 10.4236/jsea.2011.46044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Outcome in the Vegetative State by Machine Learning Algorithms: A Model for Clinicians?

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First and foremost, the straight relapse technique is utilized to ascertain the connection between the public bound together assessment results and the exhaustive assessment consequences of the framework, and Table 1 is gotten. In Figure 4, there is a huge straight connection between the consequences of the National Physical Education bound together assessment and the thorough assessment worth of the framework, R 2 = 0:9509, and on the grounds, the extensive assessment cycle of the framework does not present the aftereffects of the National Physical Education brought together assessment; however, as per the aftereffects of the physical education homeroom showing test, it is very well may be viewed as that the framework has a specific prescient incentive for the aftereffects of the National Physical Education bound together assessment [31]. The R 2 esteem estimation plot is the proportion of relapse change to direct fluctuation, which can compute the contrast between the relapse result and the first outcome.…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence Evaluation and National Physical Edu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First and foremost, the straight relapse technique is utilized to ascertain the connection between the public bound together assessment results and the exhaustive assessment consequences of the framework, and Table 1 is gotten. In Figure 4, there is a huge straight connection between the consequences of the National Physical Education bound together assessment and the thorough assessment worth of the framework, R 2 = 0:9509, and on the grounds, the extensive assessment cycle of the framework does not present the aftereffects of the National Physical Education brought together assessment; however, as per the aftereffects of the physical education homeroom showing test, it is very well may be viewed as that the framework has a specific prescient incentive for the aftereffects of the National Physical Education bound together assessment [31]. The R 2 esteem estimation plot is the proportion of relapse change to direct fluctuation, which can compute the contrast between the relapse result and the first outcome.…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence Evaluation and National Physical Edu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies focus on determining survival, predicting gross outcome, and/or identifying predictive factors of a patient's condition after TBI (usually acute TBI). Recent studies (Pignolo Pignolo and Lagani, 2011) compare different machine learning classifiers (C4.5, Support Vector Machine, Naive Bayes, K-NN) in the early prediction of outcome of the subjects in vegetative state due to TBI. As previously mentioned, neural networks have also been applied e.g.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (Pignolo & Lagani, 2011) compared four different machine learning methods (C4.5, SVM, Naïve Bayes and K-NN) to identify the most suitable algorithm in the prognostic evaluation of subjects in a vegetative state. They concluded that all tested algorithms are usable in this respect.…”
Section: Support Vector Machinesmentioning
confidence: 99%