2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2019.8857752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Plantar Forces During Gait Using Wearable Sensors and Deep Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent advances in deep learning have intriguingly shifted researchers from conventional machine learning approaches towards deep learning techniques. Most recently, gait analysis is conducted using wearable IMUs, magnetometer, 3D marker, H skeleton data, sEMG with convolutional neural network (CNN), long-short-term memory (LSTM), recurrent neural network (RNN) [25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. As a state-of-the-art technology, our focus is to investigate deep learning algorithms to analyze gait and estimate ankle joint power using wearable IMUs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in deep learning have intriguingly shifted researchers from conventional machine learning approaches towards deep learning techniques. Most recently, gait analysis is conducted using wearable IMUs, magnetometer, 3D marker, H skeleton data, sEMG with convolutional neural network (CNN), long-short-term memory (LSTM), recurrent neural network (RNN) [25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. As a state-of-the-art technology, our focus is to investigate deep learning algorithms to analyze gait and estimate ankle joint power using wearable IMUs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stetter et al evaluated their algorithm on healthy volunteers with bowlegs, which was suggested to mimic the varus misalignment in patients with knee osteoarthritis [33]. Female popu lation was underrepresented in 55 articles (~80%), while 6 articles (~8%) [30,32,[34][35][36][37] did not report complete information on the gender distribution of the study population.…”
Section: Participant Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For validation of estimated kinetics, quantities like ground reaction forces were simultaneously measured in all studies using force plates [18,29,31,34,[40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48], instrumented treadmills [14,32,38,39,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58], plantar sensors [35], force shoes [59], shoes with loadcell(s) [60,61], or insoles [62][63][64][65]. Additional kinematic data were also measured in some of the studies using systems such as optical motion capture systems [30,33,36,37,, a stereophotogrammetry system [88], or a marker-less video system [89], along with IMUs.…”
Section: Measurement Systems and Sensor Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most popular ways to detect the gait phase is to have a pressure sensor on the bottom of the wearer's foot to analyze the ground reaction force (GRF) during walking [8][9][10]. Methods used to identify the gait phase include the center of pressure (COP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nagashima et al predicted plantar force during gait to detect walking distance with a deep neural network (DNN). The DNN is used to learn the non-linear relationship between the measured sensor data and future sensor force data by using a trained network [10]. However, when detecting the gait phase, problems are often found in the wearer's physical condition, such as the sensor position, stride speed, and weight [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%