2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Shape Deviations in Face Milling of Steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore XFEM was used, which is a more efficient method, since it enriches the shape functions in order to model discontinuities along material interfaces. For evaluating the efficiency of the proposed method a typical aerospace part was used and the results were in accordance to state of the art [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore XFEM was used, which is a more efficient method, since it enriches the shape functions in order to model discontinuities along material interfaces. For evaluating the efficiency of the proposed method a typical aerospace part was used and the results were in accordance to state of the art [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9] a hybrid model consisting of 3 sub-models was developed. Each of the 2 sub-models consisted of a linear regression model and a finite element model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With SHPB tests at different temperatures, thermal softening exponent can be identified with GA or least square approximation (LSA) technique, setting the target function as equation (4). In all the tests, the strain and strain rate should be fixed as constants, e c and _ e c…”
Section: Combined Identification Methods For Parameters In J-c Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Moreover, residual stress is a key factor influencing the machining-induced deformation of thinwalled structures. 4 Thus, it is important to accurately predict and effectively control the machining-induced residual stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to face this problem, some authors proposed modified techniques for measuring BIRS based on the traditional methods and show potential to overcome some of the limitations aforementioned. Amongst them, on-machine layer removal can be highlighted [16][17][18], due to its potential for industrial implementation. The traditional layer-removal method is time-consuming as it requires strain gauges to be repeatedly glued and removed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%