2006
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-006-9091-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of steel fibre reinforced concrete under flexure from an inferred fibre pull-out response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9 indicate some very significant differences. In particular, the crack-width at peak load of the probabilistic fibre pull-out curve (occurring at around 1.2 mm) is very different from that suggested by Prudencio et al [17] and Armelin and Banthia [3], where peak load occurs at around 0.1 mm. In addition, the general shape of the probabilistic curve is very different from the other author's curves.…”
Section: /14contrasting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 indicate some very significant differences. In particular, the crack-width at peak load of the probabilistic fibre pull-out curve (occurring at around 1.2 mm) is very different from that suggested by Prudencio et al [17] and Armelin and Banthia [3], where peak load occurs at around 0.1 mm. In addition, the general shape of the probabilistic curve is very different from the other author's curves.…”
Section: /14contrasting
confidence: 80%
“…9 which compares the probabilistic curves shown in Fig. 3 with similar curves obtained from single fibre pull-out tests by Armelin and Banthia [3] and an inferred single fibre pull-out response, determined from a related study [17], using back analysis from the load-deflection responses of seven beams from series 75C(40), four of which are shown in Fig 6. In respect of the work of Armelin and Banthia [3] they adopted a similar approach to that described herein to determine their average single fibre pull-out curve, except that they assumed a random 3-D fibre distribution and incorporated a separate contribution for the strength of the fibre hook. However, it is not clear how the shape and magnitude of the contribution of the hook was determined.…”
Section: /14mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Prudencio et al [29] present an approach where the average pullout response of the fibers bridging the cracked zone is inferred from flexural tests. A stress-block approach is used to represent the stresses that develop at a cracked section.…”
Section: Direct Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical behaviour of such a material depends on the amount, orientation and spatial distribution of fibres and the particular fibre geometry, as well as design of the cementitious matrix mix and the way of concrete mix placement into the mould (Swamy, Mangat 1974;Yazici et al 2007;Bencardino 2013;Bencardino et al 2008Bencardino et al , 2013Kurihara et al 2000;Barros, Cruz 2001). Structural models simulated SFRC prisms mechanical behaviour under bending were observed in Pupurs (2011), Li andMobasher (1998), Prudencio et al (2007) and Jones et al (2007). Pull-out tests with different fibres were performed and reported in Pupurs (2011), Robins et al (2002, Kononova (2009) andNg et al (2010).…”
Section: Sfrc Cracking Process Numerical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%