2018
DOI: 10.1108/bfj-12-2017-0695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of texture in different beef cuts applying image analysis technique

Abstract: Purpose Measuring texture parameters are time consuming and expensive; it is necessary to develop an efficient and rapid method to evaluate them. Image analysis can be a useful tool. The purpose of this paper is to predict texture parameters in different beef cuts applying image analysis techniques. Design/methodology/approach Samples were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. Texture parameters were analyzed by instrumental, image analysis techniques and by Warner–Bratzler shear force. Findings Signif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The images were taken with the detector within the lens using an acceleration voltage of 3.00 kV. For each sample ( t = 0, t = 3 and t = 6), 10 images at a magnification of 250X were obtained and stored as bitmaps on a gray scale with brightness values between 0 and 255 for each pixel constituting the image (Pieniazek, Roa Andino, & Messina, 2018; Roa Andino et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The images were taken with the detector within the lens using an acceleration voltage of 3.00 kV. For each sample ( t = 0, t = 3 and t = 6), 10 images at a magnification of 250X were obtained and stored as bitmaps on a gray scale with brightness values between 0 and 255 for each pixel constituting the image (Pieniazek, Roa Andino, & Messina, 2018; Roa Andino et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Textural parameters were calculated from SEM images using the GLCM and MATLAB 8.4 software (The Math Works Inc., Massachusetts, USA) as described by Pieniazek et al (2018). The size of each sample (region of interest: 122 × 122 pixels) was the same for all the evaluated images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%