2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of the cutting temperatures of stainless steel with chamfered main cutting edge tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Şekil 4. Ferritik paslanmaz çeliğin frezelenmesinde MQL yöntemi kullanımının ve kesme sıvısına katılan MWCNT miktarının kesme sıcaklığına etkisi (40 ml/h) (The effects of MQL method and amount of MWCNT added to the cutting fluid on cutting temperature in the milling of ferritic stainless steel (40 ml/h)) sıcaklığı değerleri, Chang [19] ve Okada vd.…”
Section: Doiunclassified
“…Şekil 4. Ferritik paslanmaz çeliğin frezelenmesinde MQL yöntemi kullanımının ve kesme sıvısına katılan MWCNT miktarının kesme sıcaklığına etkisi (40 ml/h) (The effects of MQL method and amount of MWCNT added to the cutting fluid on cutting temperature in the milling of ferritic stainless steel (40 ml/h)) sıcaklığı değerleri, Chang [19] ve Okada vd.…”
Section: Doiunclassified
“…The finite element method is being increasingly used as an effective route to predicting temperature distribution due to difficulties in measuring temperature of the cutting zone and tool rake face in experiments [12], [24][25][26][27]. The plastic deformation and friction at the tool-chip interface are the main source of heat during the cutting process.…”
Section: Temperature Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the thermal analysis of the machining processes, the source of heat flux plays a key role. Most authors considered a uniform heat flux (Chang, 2007;Liu et al, 2009;Liu and Chou, 2007;Umbrello et al, 2007), while a select few considered a nonuniform heat flux in the rake face, e.g. (Haddag et al, 2013), to calculate the temperature distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%