2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of the fundamental frequencies and modal shapes of historic masonry towers by empirical equations based on experimental data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are not specific for ancient masonry churches that should require adequate formulas due to their particular structural typology. A similar approach, for instance, may be found in the recent studied of Shakya et al (2016); Bartoli et al (2017); Diaferio et al (2018); and Sarhosis et al (2018) where appropriate empirical and semiempirical formulations for predicting the main frequency of slender masonry towers have been proposed.…”
Section: Estimation Of Main Modal Frequency With Existing National Comentioning
confidence: 96%
“…They are not specific for ancient masonry churches that should require adequate formulas due to their particular structural typology. A similar approach, for instance, may be found in the recent studied of Shakya et al (2016); Bartoli et al (2017); Diaferio et al (2018); and Sarhosis et al (2018) where appropriate empirical and semiempirical formulations for predicting the main frequency of slender masonry towers have been proposed.…”
Section: Estimation Of Main Modal Frequency With Existing National Comentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This parameter is usually unknown; however, under the assumption that the restraint offered by lateral buildings can be modelled as fixed restraints along a certain portion of the tower with unknown height, the uncertainties related to the lateral restraint condition can be represented through the PDF of the length of the laterally unrestrained part of the tower. By indicating with effective height (h) the height of the unrestrained part of the tower [34][35][36], a schematic representation of this parameter is given in figure 4 for both the main directions of the tower. To account for the uncertainties related to the effectiveness of the restraint conditions introduced by the surrounding structures, a PDF was selected to represent the initial hypotheses about the effective height.…”
Section: (Iii) Lateral Restraint Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scientific literature has already shown the key role played by the masonry elastic modulus and the effective height in the identification of the dynamic behaviour of non-isolated masonry towers [34,35]. This suggests, when the experimental data of the natural periods are collected, that the application of the BMu framework can consider the vector θ as composed by the elastic modulus, E, and the effective height of the tower, h. The Bayesian paradigm is here employed to update the PDF of the component of the vector.…”
Section: (A) Bayesian Model Updatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first step in this direction is the definition of an accurate numerical model of the structure in its actual conditions, including the identification of possible damages. To this respect, the identification of modal properties, as natural frequencies, modal damping coefficients and mode shapes in a linear elastic structure can be used to verify the correspondence of a Finite Element (FE) model of the structure to its real behaviour, updating the numerical model on the base of experimental tests (D'Ambrisi et al 2012;Diaferio et al 2015Diaferio et al , 2018Gentile and Saisi 2010;Potenza et al 2015;Ivorra et al 2016;Antonacci et al 2012;Sepe et al 2005aSepe et al , b, 2017Valente et al 2016;Bedon et al 2016). Moreover, the experimental modal analysis techniques are able to highlight some peculiarities of the structural response that are usually neglected or that are difficult to be evaluated in the design process (as the influence of the non-structural elements on the dynamical response of the building, the presence of inhomogeneities, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%