2019
DOI: 10.3389/fbuil.2019.00018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simplified Formulations for Estimating the Main Frequencies of Ancient Masonry Churches

Abstract: This paper proposes simplified formulations for estimating the main frequencies of ancient masonry churches. The formulations are derived starting from the results of numerical analyses with finite elements models, whose geometric parameters are assigned in accordance with specific relationships established on a set of 50 existing churches. The so-obtained formulations are also compared with the results of a series of experimental dynamic identification tests chosen from literature. Finally, starting from thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), evaluating possible interactions with adjacent elements. Applications of this approach may be found, among the others, in Betti et al (2018), Brandonisio et al (2013), D'Ayala and Paganoni (2011), Doglioni et al (1994), Formisano and Marzo (2017), Lagomarsino and Podestà (2004a,b), while a recent investigation on the estimation of main frequency of ancient masonry churches may be found in Lopez et al (2019).…”
Section: Seismic Assessment Methods Indicated In the Italian Directivementioning
confidence: 96%
“…), evaluating possible interactions with adjacent elements. Applications of this approach may be found, among the others, in Betti et al (2018), Brandonisio et al (2013), D'Ayala and Paganoni (2011), Doglioni et al (1994), Formisano and Marzo (2017), Lagomarsino and Podestà (2004a,b), while a recent investigation on the estimation of main frequency of ancient masonry churches may be found in Lopez et al (2019).…”
Section: Seismic Assessment Methods Indicated In the Italian Directivementioning
confidence: 96%
“…The causes of high vulnerability even at very low levels of seismic forces may be different due, for instance, to structural irregularities, inadequate design, poor quality of materials, absence of constructive details, and scarce maintenance (Krstevska et al, 2010;Betti and Vignoli, 2011;Milani and Valente, 2015a;Clementi et al, 2017a,b;Fonti et al, 2017;Formisano et al, , 2018Milani et al, 2017a;Valente et al, 2017;Luchin et al, 2018;Valente and Milani, 2018a,b,c). After the recent seismic events, many efforts of the scientific community have been done in order to develop appropriate procedures for implementing seismic vulnerability analysis (Formisano, 2017;Formisano and Marzo, 2017;Laterza et al, 2017;Lopez et al, 2019) and specific retrofitting interventions (Faggiano et al, 2009;Terracciano et al, 2015;D'Amato et al, 2017;Milani et al, 2017bMilani et al, , 2018. In particular, as previously introduced, recurrent seismic damages were observed in historic masonry buildings characterized by local out-of-plane and in-plane response mechanisms regarding one or more isolated structure portions (Lagomarsino and Podestà, 2004;Formisano et al, 2010;Leite et al, 2013;Gattulli et al, 2014;Milani and Valente, 2015b;Stockdale, 2016;Valente et al, 2016;Betti et al, 2018;De Matteis et al, 2019;Fuentes et al, 2019b;Penna et al, 2019;Ramirez et al, 2019).…”
Section: Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Of Historical Constructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these mechanisms, there is a wealth of literature references aimed at calculating the ultimate load factors by means of limit analysis, especially with kinematic approaches considering frictional behaviour [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. In the last few decades, researchers have also developed analytical methods in the field of finite element (FE) analyses to examine ordinary masonry constructions [13][14][15][16][17] or have implemented large scale and detailed numerical investigations to study monumental constructions like churches [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%