2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of the residual state in 304 austenitic steel after laser shock peening – Effects of plastic deformation and martensitic phase transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fu et al (2013) have studied the evolution of residual stresses both in the austenitic and martensitic phases in the 18CrNiMo7-6 steel and showed that it was higher in the martensitic phase of higher yield strength. In 2016, using a large strain formulation of transformation plasticity, Halilovic et al proposed the very first numerical simulation of the residual stress state in AISI 304 peened steel with a single laser shot (Halilovic et al, 2016). They concluded that at low temperature the residual stress state is mainly caused by phase transformation, and it is mainly due to plastic deformation at high temperature.…”
Section: Nomenclature 2amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fu et al (2013) have studied the evolution of residual stresses both in the austenitic and martensitic phases in the 18CrNiMo7-6 steel and showed that it was higher in the martensitic phase of higher yield strength. In 2016, using a large strain formulation of transformation plasticity, Halilovic et al proposed the very first numerical simulation of the residual stress state in AISI 304 peened steel with a single laser shot (Halilovic et al, 2016). They concluded that at low temperature the residual stress state is mainly caused by phase transformation, and it is mainly due to plastic deformation at high temperature.…”
Section: Nomenclature 2amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies analysed the residual stresses in the different phases such as austenite, ferrite if present, and created martensite, along with their evolving volume fractions [35] [36] [37] [38] [39]. For the modeling of shot-peening with phase transformation, Halilovič et al [40] developed a finite element model for laser shock peening on AISI 304 steel by using a material model developed by [34] and implemented in ABAQUS. Guiheux et al [38] applied the elastoplastic and phase transformation model developed by Kubler et al [41] to predict the residual stress fields and phase transformation under a single impact on AISI 301 LN fully austenitic steel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the authors knowledge, only Fu et al (2013) have experimentally studied the stress state in both austenitic and martensitic constituents after shot-peening. For the modeling of surface treatment with phase transformation and the prediction of residual stresses, Halilovič et al (2016) have presented a parametric numerical study of laser shock peening (LSP) on an AISI304 steel using the material model developed by Hallberg et al (2007) implemented in an Abaqus UMAT subroutine. They have investigated the temperature effects in LSP, and have shown that, at lower temperatures, the phase transformation was the main cause for residual stresses generation, while plasticity dominates the residual state at higher temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%