2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of the Wind Turbine Performance by Using a Modified BEM Theory with an Advanced Brake State Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BEM approach gives a good approximation of wind turbine behaviour but has its shortcomings in its basic form [59]. Therefore, several analytical models were developed and integrated within a BEM model to account for, e.g., tip losses [60,61], dynamic stall induced by boundary layer separation [62,63], blade flexibility [64,65] and disturbed wind flow caused by the nacelle or tower [66].…”
Section: Pmsgmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The BEM approach gives a good approximation of wind turbine behaviour but has its shortcomings in its basic form [59]. Therefore, several analytical models were developed and integrated within a BEM model to account for, e.g., tip losses [60,61], dynamic stall induced by boundary layer separation [62,63], blade flexibility [64,65] and disturbed wind flow caused by the nacelle or tower [66].…”
Section: Pmsgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it allows combining the merits of different modelling techniques eventually leading to a more realistic virtual replica. Computational Fluid Dynamics [69] FEM structural blade model [70][71][72] Large Eddy Simulation (LES) [78][79][80] FEM model of turbine shaft [103] FEM model of the tower and support structure [89,90] Electromagnetic FEM [109][110][111] Dynamic switching models [127][128][129] Conduction and switching loss models [130,131] Transient wide-bandgap component models [132] Full pitch drivetrain models [150][151][152][153] Full yaw drivetrain models [154,155] Blade-Element Momentum [57] Extensions -Tip losses [60,61] -Dynamic stall [62,63] -Blade flexibility [64,65] -Tower and nacelle flow disturbance [66] -Gaussian [82] or Curl [83] wake model Surrogate models [73][74][75] Multi-body drivetrain model [101,102] Multi-body tower and foundation model [84][85][86]<...>…”
Section: Virtual Replicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…acting on the blade in the streamtube. In the calculation process, Brake State Model (BSM) is often employed to compute the axial and tangential induction factors (a and a , respectively) [22,23,24,25]. Despite its simplicity and computationally cheap compared with high fidelity modelling method such as Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) simulation, BEM is able to produce fairly accurate performance prediction within 20% uncertainty [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to consider the centrifugal pumping effect caused by the radial flow of the blades (Himmel Kamp effect), Arramach et al established a model by using the aerodynamic coefficients of the pre-stall and post-stall regions. The numerical calculation program was used to predict the WT aerodynamic forces and power (Arramach et al, 2017). Because the minimum WT flow velocities of standard airfoils were about 7 m/s at stall angles of attack, Yavuz et al (2015) chose NACA4412-NACA6411 slat-airfoil arrangement to investigate the potential performance improvements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%