2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2004.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of three-dimensional fractal dimensions using the two-dimensional properties of fractal aggregates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
97
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16] Several experimental results have confirmed that aggregates have a fractal geometry [e.g., Vicsek, 1992;Li et al, 1998;Lee and Kramer, 2004;Burd and Jackson, 2009]. For an aggregate formed from initially identical primary particles having an effective diameter d j , the number of primary particles (N j ) in an aggregate can be estimated using a well-known fractal relationship [Jullien and Botet, 1987;Frenklach, 2002;Lee and Kramer, 2004]:…”
Section: A Simplified Aggregation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[16] Several experimental results have confirmed that aggregates have a fractal geometry [e.g., Vicsek, 1992;Li et al, 1998;Lee and Kramer, 2004;Burd and Jackson, 2009]. For an aggregate formed from initially identical primary particles having an effective diameter d j , the number of primary particles (N j ) in an aggregate can be estimated using a well-known fractal relationship [Jullien and Botet, 1987;Frenklach, 2002;Lee and Kramer, 2004]:…”
Section: A Simplified Aggregation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an aggregate formed from initially identical primary particles having an effective diameter d j , the number of primary particles (N j ) in an aggregate can be estimated using a well-known fractal relationship [Jullien and Botet, 1987;Frenklach, 2002;Lee and Kramer, 2004]:…”
Section: A Simplified Aggregation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sphericity and solidity of the colloids (see Supplementary information for definitions) determined from TEM-micrographs were similar at the three sites, implying that no significant difference in colloid shape or porosity between the sites could be shown. In addition, the fractal dimensions of the colloids determined using a simplified approach described by Lee and Kramer (2004) (Supplementary information, Table S1), were in the range 1.77-1.86 at all four sites, indicating that they had been formed by diffusion-limited aggregation, e.g., without any strong repulsion between the smaller components forming the colloids (Lin et al, 1998). No significant difference could be shown between TEM and AFM fractal dimensions at sites B and C, but there was a small but significant difference at site A, and a highly significant difference at site D (Mann-Whitney U-test with P = 0.05 significance level).…”
Section: Total and Filterable Fraction Of Major And Microelements In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the fractal dimension is calculated using the number of primary particles in the system that are detected using videomicroscopy. The relation of the values of D f and the two dimensional fractal dimensions is not an straightforward matter as has been pointed out in [19,20,21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%