2019
DOI: 10.1177/1687814019856841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of wheel wear of different types of articulated monorail based on co-simulation of MATLAB and UM software

Abstract: Analysis of the Chongqing monorail shows that there is no relationship between wheel wear and radial force, which means the radial force cannot be used to evaluate the wheel wear of monorail. Due to the same physical significance of the Schallamach tire wear model for automobiles, the wear index of railway wheels, which represents the creep power of unit wheel–rail contact area, is proved to be effective in evaluating the wheel wear of railway vehicles, automobiles, and vehicles with both properties, namely, m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the traditional study of railway vehicles, if a single peak frequency of simulation acceleration is consistent with the experiment data, the simulation is successful [14][15][16]. By scaling the amplitude and wavelength of road irregularities and modifying some vehicle parameters, the author [17,18] has made a single peak frequency of the car body simulation acceleration close to the measured value. However, there is a significant error between the scaled road spectrum and the theoretical value.…”
Section: Introduction 11 Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the traditional study of railway vehicles, if a single peak frequency of simulation acceleration is consistent with the experiment data, the simulation is successful [14][15][16]. By scaling the amplitude and wavelength of road irregularities and modifying some vehicle parameters, the author [17,18] has made a single peak frequency of the car body simulation acceleration close to the measured value. However, there is a significant error between the scaled road spectrum and the theoretical value.…”
Section: Introduction 11 Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Thus, the following equation could be obtained: (18) 𝑨 ̅ denotes the mean value of 𝑨 ̂𝑴×𝟏 . Set 𝑌 𝑟 = 1 − 𝑅 2 , the following equation could be obtained.…”
Section: Evaluation Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm of the sequential emergency braking and the simulation control subsystem were implemented in this module, by defining such parameters as the maximum speed of the set, force vectors, and moments defined in the model, and by setting the parameters of the emergency braking algorithm. Defining the input and output signals of each of these modules enabled their connection and use of the co-simulation to simulate the emergency braking of a suspended monorail from the given speed, with different settings of the braking algorithm parameters [13,27,[30][31][32][33]. The structure of the computational model and the signal flow, are presented in Figure 2.…”
Section: Computational Model and Its Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional modeling method for vehicle system are the multi rigid body dynamic method and vehiclebridge coupling dynamic method. [31][32][33][34][35][36] The dynamic models of the two method are shown in Figure 7:…”
Section: Simulation Process Of the Vehicle-bridge Coupling Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%