2014
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.554.724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Wind Flow around High-Rise Buildings Using RANS Models

Abstract: Recently, CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) is being increasingly used to investigation of the flow around high-rise buildings. In this study, prediction of wind flow around two cases high-rise buildings model placed within the surface boundary layer were carried out using various turbulence models. The accuracy of two-equation turbulence models were compared with experimental data of Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ).as a result, all two-equation models are shown overestimation the reattachment length b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tan and Li simulated the wind effects on a super high-rise TV tower and found that the Realizable K-Epsilon (RKE) model could come up with more accurate results in terms of mean pressure coefficients and streamlines than the Standard K-Epsilon (SKE) and RNG K-Epsilon models [20]. Behrouzi et al presented two cases of wind flow around high-rise buildings and concluded that the RNG K-Epsilon model and the RKE model overpredicted the reattachment length behind the buildings [21]. Likewise, other scholars also pointed out the inaccuracy of using revised k-epsilon models in reproducing the weak-wind area and the reattachment length behind the building [22][23][24][25].The Reynolds Stress Model (RSM) with modified inlet atmosphere boundary conditions, as proposed by Zhang et al, was able to better simulate the wind flow around high-rise buildings [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tan and Li simulated the wind effects on a super high-rise TV tower and found that the Realizable K-Epsilon (RKE) model could come up with more accurate results in terms of mean pressure coefficients and streamlines than the Standard K-Epsilon (SKE) and RNG K-Epsilon models [20]. Behrouzi et al presented two cases of wind flow around high-rise buildings and concluded that the RNG K-Epsilon model and the RKE model overpredicted the reattachment length behind the buildings [21]. Likewise, other scholars also pointed out the inaccuracy of using revised k-epsilon models in reproducing the weak-wind area and the reattachment length behind the building [22][23][24][25].The Reynolds Stress Model (RSM) with modified inlet atmosphere boundary conditions, as proposed by Zhang et al, was able to better simulate the wind flow around high-rise buildings [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial facilities, such as buildings and solar panels, have significant influences on the atmospheric boundary-layer flow, but most simulations of the flow field around obstacles only model the flow field around isolated structures rather than groups of obstacles (Lien et al, 2004). For example, many scholars, based on the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) method, calculated the flow field around an isolated building (Montazeri and Blocken, 2013;Blocken, 2014;Chiu et al, 2017) and around two interactive buildings (Ramponi and Blocken, 2012;Behrouzi et al, 2014). Hunter et al (1990) calculated the three-dimension (3-D) characteristics of the flow field within an urban canyon based on the turbulence model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%