2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction uncertainty and data worth assessment for groundwater transport times in an agricultural catchment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The forecast-specific nature of observation worth has also been reported previously (e.g., Dausman et al, 2010;Fienen et al, 2010;White et al, 2016). The worth of MRT observations relative to various hydraulic potential and discharge observations across the different forecasts are, in general terms, similar to those reported by Hunt et al (2006), Masbruch et al (2014), Oehlmann et al (2015), and Zell et al (2018) (especially when considering the discussion point in the following paragraph).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The forecast-specific nature of observation worth has also been reported previously (e.g., Dausman et al, 2010;Fienen et al, 2010;White et al, 2016). The worth of MRT observations relative to various hydraulic potential and discharge observations across the different forecasts are, in general terms, similar to those reported by Hunt et al (2006), Masbruch et al (2014), Oehlmann et al (2015), and Zell et al (2018) (especially when considering the discussion point in the following paragraph).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Furthermore, we expect the above-mentioned issues associated with imperfect-model data assimilation to be relevant and largely transferrable to the assimilation of other environmental tracers, other information-rich observations and diverse data types more generally. This is because we consider the primary barrier to the appropriate assimilation of tritium observation data encountered in the second case study to be fundamental challenges associated with extracting appropriate information from spatially discrete concentration observations when using upscaled or simplified representations of hydraulic properties within a regional-scale model that simulates tracer concentrations using the advection-dispersion equation (e.g., Zheng and Gorelick, 2003;Riva et al, 2008). To the extent that simulated outputs corresponding to observed tracer concentrations are sensitive to model details or parameters that are "missing" in a simplified model (e.g., White et al, 2014), parameter compensation will occur (e.g., Clark and Vrugt, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We agree that the specific finding from the first case study that the spring discharge observations are of most "worth" when considering spring discharge forecasts is not surprising. We state this explicitly on Lines 243-245: "The worth of MRT observations relative to various hydraulic potential and discharge observations across the different forecasts are, in general terms, similar to those reported by Zell et al (2018)". To address this comment, we will add the Hunt et al 2006…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…To be clear, no actual parameter estimation is undertaken as part of the first case study. FOSM techniques have been widely employed for data worth assessment in this notional context in many settings as it enables rapid exploration of the worth of many different combinations of conditional forecast variances in a computationally efficient manner (e.g., Wallis et al, 2014;Zell et al, 2018). We will address this comment by…”
Section: Discussion Papermentioning
confidence: 99%