2015 European Control Conference (ECC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ecc.2015.7330847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive control algorithm for spacecraft rendezvous hovering phases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea is to provide a validated model predictive control (MPC) algorithm to steer the follower satellite in a fuel-optimal way to the hovering region. The MPC uses a priori knowledge about the dynamics of the relative motion between spacecraft to iteratively compute the control corrections that fulfill fuel-optimality and constraints [7,29].…”
Section: B Model Predictive Control For the Rendezvous Hovering Phasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The idea is to provide a validated model predictive control (MPC) algorithm to steer the follower satellite in a fuel-optimal way to the hovering region. The MPC uses a priori knowledge about the dynamics of the relative motion between spacecraft to iteratively compute the control corrections that fulfill fuel-optimality and constraints [7,29].…”
Section: B Model Predictive Control For the Rendezvous Hovering Phasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative dynamics equations are developed by a new linearization of Equation (28) about the station keeping point (29). Denoting x = x eoe − x sk , the relative state model for the SK problem is computed as follows:…”
Section: B Linearizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, with ever advancing computational hardware, and active research into more efficient algorithms, online optimisation has become less of a barrier to application, and there has recently been significant activity in exploiting both the ability to handle constraints and time-varying systems, whilst optimising a given performance metric in the context of spacecraft rendezvous. Examples of how MPC has been employed include: accommodating limited input authority (thrust constraints) [14]- [26]; using non-quadratic cost functions to achieve particular types of behaviour, for example sparse control actions [14], [15], [17], [20], [23], [24], [27]; enforcing line-of-sight constraints [15], [16], [18], [19], [21], [22], [26]; enforcing soft-docking constraints (the approach velocity reduces in line with with distance to the target) [18], [21]; collision avoidance (with the target and obstacles) [14], [16]- [18], [21], [26]; fault-tolerance by constraining open-loop unforced trajectories to achieve passive safety [16], [28]; accommodating time-varying prediction dynamics (such as those describing relative motion in elliptical orbits) [17], [27], [29], [30]; accommodating time-varying objectives and constraints (such as docking with a tumbling or rotating target) [18], [21]; fuel-efficient station or formation keeping [31], [32] and handling interaction between attitude and translation control [17], [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%