1983
DOI: 10.1021/i200022a025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive control based on discrete convolution models

Abstract: In several recent studies a discrete convolution representation of a dynamic system has been used to develop new digital control algorithms based on the prediction of future outputs. This paper presents a fundamental analysis of the concepts involved In designing both predictor and control elements for such algorithms. For single-input, single-output systems, the predicted controller Is equivalent to a discrete feedback controller which operates on the current output and past input signals. Simulation and expe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
39
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1, the prediction outputs depend on the control signals u(t + k|t), which are calculated by minimizing a quadratic cost function of the errors between a reference trajectory and the predicted process output, over P. Usually only the first control signal, u(t|t), is sent to the plant and the procedure is repeated at the next sampling instant. The reason for implementing the first control signal is to keep the predictions closer to the measured values of the controlled variable [16], to account for unmeasurable disturbances and to react to set-point changes. At this stage, the theory will be presented on several MPC controllers.…”
Section: Existing Mpc Controllersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, the prediction outputs depend on the control signals u(t + k|t), which are calculated by minimizing a quadratic cost function of the errors between a reference trajectory and the predicted process output, over P. Usually only the first control signal, u(t|t), is sent to the plant and the procedure is repeated at the next sampling instant. The reason for implementing the first control signal is to keep the predictions closer to the measured values of the controlled variable [16], to account for unmeasurable disturbances and to react to set-point changes. At this stage, the theory will be presented on several MPC controllers.…”
Section: Existing Mpc Controllersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their formulations were heuristic and algorithmic and took advantage of the increasing potential of digital computers at that time. For open-loop stable processes, dynamic matrix control (DMC) quickly become popular particularly in chemical process industries, due to the simplicity of the algorithm and to the use of easily obtainable impulse or step response models [177,69]. To handle a wider class of unstable and non-minimum phase systems the generalized predictive control (GPC) scheme was introduced [77].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…

In predictive control, control calculations are done such that the difference between the desired and the predicted response of the process is minimized. Marchetti et al (1983) recommended small values of optimization and control horizons. Earlier papers have shown that the control performance obtained using the DMC algorithm can also be obtained by using a simplified algorithm where the error is minimized at one point and one future control move is calculated.

…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marchetti et al (1983) recommended small values of optimization and control horizons. Another approach is to see if minimizing errors over a prediction horizon of four to five time constants in length and calculating a number of control moves is really necessary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%