ASME 2010 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, Volume 1 2010
DOI: 10.1115/dscc2010-4263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Control of Autonomous Ground Vehicles With Obstacle Avoidance on Slippery Roads

Abstract: Two frameworks based on Model Predictive Control (MPC) for obstacle avoidance with autonomous vehicles are presented. A given trajectory represents the driver intent. An MPC has to safely avoid obstacles on the road while trying to track the desired trajectory by controlling front steering angle and differential braking. We present two different approaches to this problem. The first approach solves a single nonlinear MPC problem. The second approach uses a hierarchical scheme. At the high-level, a trajectory i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
142
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
142
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The challenge of these approaches is in deciding the adequate assumptions and abstractions for the domain-specific knowledge. In predictive control [18][19][20], for example, the controller decides the value of the control signal based on the predicted, rather than the current, values of parameters pertinent to the state of the car and its environment. The prediction could be seen as approximating the values of these parameters from their current values, their rate of change, and the prediction time that corresponds to the latencies in the control loop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge of these approaches is in deciding the adequate assumptions and abstractions for the domain-specific knowledge. In predictive control [18][19][20], for example, the controller decides the value of the control signal based on the predicted, rather than the current, values of parameters pertinent to the state of the car and its environment. The prediction could be seen as approximating the values of these parameters from their current values, their rate of change, and the prediction time that corresponds to the latencies in the control loop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5], the MPC problem has been formulated as a quadratic program (QP) by limiting the intervention to the steering, and linearizing the vehicle dynamics around a constant vehicle speed and small slip angles. In [8]- [10], the authors address the problem of integrated braking and steering control by using a hierarchical control architecture. A high-level controller generates an obstacle-free trajectory, while a low level controller tracks this planned trajectory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where C * U and C * L are functions of the parameters in (8). The corresponding slip angle intervals in which the upper and lower approximations are valid are denoted as…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], a hierarchical approach for automated highway driving was introduced, where the high-level control uses a point-mass representation of the vehicle. This might work well for steady-state conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%