2014 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion 2014
DOI: 10.1109/speedam.2014.6871930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive current control of saturated cross-coupled permanent magnet synchronous machines

Abstract: Abstract-Highly utilized permanent magnet synchronous machines show magnetic saturation and cross-coupling effects. These phenomena are described by nonlinear differential equations and make feedback current control of the machine challenging. State of the art current control methods usually ignore these effects and hence do not produce optimal results in transient operation or in operation at the inverter voltage limit. Therefore, this paper presents a method to design a current controller taking into account… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is possible because the cross-saturation inductances L dq , L qd are a lot smaller than the self-inductances L dd , L qq in IPMSMs. For the machine under test they are at least five times smaller in the typical operational area [2].…”
Section: Time Continuous Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is possible because the cross-saturation inductances L dq , L qd are a lot smaller than the self-inductances L dd , L qq in IPMSMs. For the machine under test they are at least five times smaller in the typical operational area [2].…”
Section: Time Continuous Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electromagnetic behavior of the machine has to be known to allow dynamic, stable and accurate control of these machines. Precise machine models with parameter lookup tables (LUT) are applied for that purpose [1,2,3]. The parameters are given by the flux linkages, the inductances and the stator resistance and have to be identified before control is possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second drawback is that conventional controllers such as the PI-controller yield poorer dynamics compared to predictive controllers [19]. Regarding EESMs, this is of major concern as the inductance of the rotor winding is often much greater than the stator inductance [13], [14].…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) is a DSP from Texas Instruments (TMS320C6748) which executes the machine controller with a control frequency of f c = 8 kHz. The HIL simulator is controlled by a nonlinear current controller for saturated crosscoupled PMSMs described in [13]. Since the current hardware setup is only designed for low-level signals, the machine controller pulses a small signal six-pulse bridge, realized with bipolar transistors, to generate the required pulsed output voltage for the A/D-converter of the signal processing unit.…”
Section: B Device Under Testmentioning
confidence: 99%