1997
DOI: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12289732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Dosimetry for Threshold Phototoxicity in Photodynamic Therapy on Normal Skin: Red Wavelengths Produce More Extensive Damage Than Blue at Equal Threshold Doses

Abstract: The goal of this investigation was to establish methodology to determine and prevent phototoxic responses of normal skin to photodynamic therapy (PDT). The drug used was a second-generation photosensitizer, benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring A (BPD-MA). The dependence of skin phototoxicity on drug dose (0.5-2.0 mg/kg), fluence (1.2-390 J/cm2), and wavelength (690 nm and 458 nm) was studied in the New Zealand albino rabbit in the first 5 h after injection. Skin responses were recorded for 2 wk after irradi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17 We also chose a red LED for the light source because the LED light does not generate heat as easily as do other light sources, and 630 nm is the peak excitation wavelength of verteporfin. 20,21 We then conducted another pilot study to develop a retinal degeneration model with verteporfin and a red LED. We changed the dose of verteporfin (0.24, 0.47, and 0.96 mg/kg), total irradiation time (45 and 90 minutes), irradiation direction (1 and 3 directions) and distance (0 and 15 mm), and finally succeeded in creating substantial damage to the outer retinal layers with a dose of 0.47 mg/kg verteporfin and irradiation from 3 directions for 30 minutes, each when the red LED was placed just in front of the diffuser contact lens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 We also chose a red LED for the light source because the LED light does not generate heat as easily as do other light sources, and 630 nm is the peak excitation wavelength of verteporfin. 20,21 We then conducted another pilot study to develop a retinal degeneration model with verteporfin and a red LED. We changed the dose of verteporfin (0.24, 0.47, and 0.96 mg/kg), total irradiation time (45 and 90 minutes), irradiation direction (1 and 3 directions) and distance (0 and 15 mm), and finally succeeded in creating substantial damage to the outer retinal layers with a dose of 0.47 mg/kg verteporfin and irradiation from 3 directions for 30 minutes, each when the red LED was placed just in front of the diffuser contact lens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved by an appropriate photon source distribution within the limits governed by the optical properties of the tissue. [31][32][33] Additional selectivity is provided by the pharmacokinetics of the photosensitizers, leading to a local di®erential accumulation and retention in GBM tumor tissue versus normal intracranial tissues to provide selectivity particularly in BAT seeded with micro in¯ltrates. 34,35 For ALA, glioblastoma shows a larger synthesis and retention of PpIX compared to the normal surrounding brain tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected benzoporphyrin derivative (BPD) monoacid ring A as the photosensitizer due to initial vascular predominance [19-22], proven safety and efficacy, and photosensitivity of relatively short duration [13,23]. Yellow light was selected due to high BPD absorption and limited depth of vascular injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%