2015
DOI: 10.2319/052415-350.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive factors of sagittal stability after treatment of Class II malocclusions

Abstract: Objective: To determine the existence of factors permitting the prediction of sagittal stability after orthodontic treatment in patients with Angle Class II malocclusion. Materials and Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to March 2015. Inclusion criteria were longitudinal studies with at least 10 subjects investigating associations between at least one factor and stability, with an average minimum follow-up period of 2 years; stability measured using posttreatment sagittal dental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A quality assessment was performed based on the method described by Bondemark et al [12, 13]. Following this method, studies were assigned to the grading of A, B, & C. A was considered high-quality evidence, B was a moderate value of evidence and C was considered the low value of evidence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quality assessment was performed based on the method described by Bondemark et al [12, 13]. Following this method, studies were assigned to the grading of A, B, & C. A was considered high-quality evidence, B was a moderate value of evidence and C was considered the low value of evidence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the systems proposed by Buschang et al (1986) and Turchetta et al (2007) could be good predictors, there would be other factors influencing the success of treatment in class II malocclusions and not considered by them. Based on the above, there is evidence suggesting that the risk of recurrence or lack of stability in class II treatment could be attributed to a severe pre‐treatment sagittal relationship (greatly increased overjet and a class II cusp ratio in molars and canines) and even the timing of the treatment would not have a greater influence on recurrence (Wins et al, 2016), which would not be considered in the proposed prediction systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The truncated bridle of the tongue and its irregular articulation lead to the deformation of the dental alveolar arches, in particular to the open bite. Such anomalies of the structure of the cavity of the mouth as the shape of the palate, the position of the teeth, the shape and position of the tongue in rest, and other functions of the dental-jaw system (13,14) play a special role in clarity of pronunciation of sounds. The interrelation and interdependence of malocclusions and articulatory disorders were emphasized by V. D. Kuroyedova and her coauthors (4) in his studies, noting that the anomalies of the appliance of articulation sharply distort the pronunciation and speech-work without orthodontic correction turns out to be ineffective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%