1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-4467-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Inference: An Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
607
0
9

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 948 publications
(622 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
607
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…We also belief that interpretation of probabilities is easier than interpretation of confidence results. Nevertheless, as combinatorical computations for our results often coincide with those for classical frequentist methods, as indicated for some resultR in section 3, our results could also be interpreted from classical frequentist perspectives, in the same way as A(n) itself can be interpreted purely frequentistically [11].…”
Section: Low Structure Inferencesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We also belief that interpretation of probabilities is easier than interpretation of confidence results. Nevertheless, as combinatorical computations for our results often coincide with those for classical frequentist methods, as indicated for some resultR in section 3, our results could also be interpreted from classical frequentist perspectives, in the same way as A(n) itself can be interpreted purely frequentistically [11].…”
Section: Low Structure Inferencesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Two standard metrics are used to quantify the accuracy of prediction algorithms: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) [26] and Precision [27,28]. In principle, a link prediction algorithm provides an ordered list of all non-observed links (i.e., U − E T ) or equivalently gives each non-observed link, say (x, y) ∈ U − E T , a score s xy to quantify its existence likelihood.…”
Section: Problem Description and Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It fits rather naturally with the low-structure environment for which PLS was invented, with its soft or fuzzy relationships between (composite) variables. See e. g. S. Geisser (1993) and T. Hastie et al (2002) for cross-validation techniques and analyses. Cross-validation was embraced early by Herman Wold.…”
Section: Potentially Useful Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%