2023
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Modeling of PROTAC Cell Permeability with Machine Learning

Abstract: Approaches for predicting proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) cell permeability are of major interest to reduce resource-demanding synthesis and testing of low-permeable PROTACs. We report a comprehensive investigation of the scope and limitations of machine learning-based binary classification models developed using 17 simple descriptors for large and structurally diverse sets of cereblon (CRBN) and von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) PROTACs. For the VHL PROTAC set, kappa nearest neighbor and random forest models per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was likely that a PROTAC with PEG-type linkers that evoked folded conformation would be transported through passive diffusion to a greater extent than a PROTAC with alkyl linkers that evoked elongated anti-conformation in in vitro permeation assay calculating passive permeability using Caco-2 cell monolayers. Nevertheless, PROTACs with PEG-type linkers and PROTACs with alkyl linkers demonstrated permeation through the artificial membrane, to the same degree, in a parallel artificial membrane permeability assay (PAMPA) [ 16 ]. The prediction of the permeability will be improved by machine learning methods through physical property factors such as molecular weight, hetero atoms, H-bond donors, H-bond acceptors, the number of rotatable bonds (NRotB), logD, and the polar surface area (PSA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was likely that a PROTAC with PEG-type linkers that evoked folded conformation would be transported through passive diffusion to a greater extent than a PROTAC with alkyl linkers that evoked elongated anti-conformation in in vitro permeation assay calculating passive permeability using Caco-2 cell monolayers. Nevertheless, PROTACs with PEG-type linkers and PROTACs with alkyl linkers demonstrated permeation through the artificial membrane, to the same degree, in a parallel artificial membrane permeability assay (PAMPA) [ 16 ]. The prediction of the permeability will be improved by machine learning methods through physical property factors such as molecular weight, hetero atoms, H-bond donors, H-bond acceptors, the number of rotatable bonds (NRotB), logD, and the polar surface area (PSA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[125] Moreover, machine-learning algorithms have been used to assess the intrinsic degradability of POIs, [137] and PROTAC permeability. [138][139]…”
Section: Machine Learning-based Pipelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning has also been applied in methods such as DeepPROTACs to detect the capacity of PROTACs to induce degradation (Figure 4). [125] Moreover, machine‐learning algorithms have been used to assess the intrinsic degradability of POIs, [137] and PROTAC permeability [138–139] …”
Section: Computational Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of ML methods for the prediction of membrane permeability has also sharply increased in recent years. Some examples include neural networks, support-vector machines, and random forest classifiers trained on molecular structures and physicochemical properties of small and large compounds. To predict degrader permeability, Poongavanam et al have tested several binary classifiers using descriptors that represent molecular size, shape, and chemical functionalities. While predictions were good (accuracy >80%) in some cases (e.g., VHL-recruiting degraders), the classifiers performed poorly on cereblon-recruiting degraders due to imbalances in the corresponding training data.…”
Section: Modeling the Tpd Processmentioning
confidence: 99%