2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive modelling and Pareto optimization for energy efficient grinding based on aANN-embedded NSGA II algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Modern modeling techniques based on neural networks and the support vector method are increasingly used to solve complex engineering problems, which can potentially provide better prediction accuracy. Wang et al [14], based on a neural model using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA II), solved the problem of multi-criteria optimization in the grinding process. They presented compromise solutions between criteria related to energy and time efficiency and product quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern modeling techniques based on neural networks and the support vector method are increasingly used to solve complex engineering problems, which can potentially provide better prediction accuracy. Wang et al [14], based on a neural model using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA II), solved the problem of multi-criteria optimization in the grinding process. They presented compromise solutions between criteria related to energy and time efficiency and product quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dai et al [23] studied the effect of grinding speed on grinding temperature and power consumption and analyzed the grinding surface performance from the perspective of undeformed chip thickness. Wang et al [24] developed a nonparametric model based on an improved adaptive Artificial Neural Network (aANN) to predict surface quality, machining time, total power consumption, and effective power consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific grinding energy and material removal energy of the spindle has been well-modelled [ 38 , 39 ]. In our previous studies, both total and active energies of the spindle were analysed and optimized using machine learning and genetic algorithms [ 40 , 41 , 42 ]. However, repeated and intermittent infeed movements and high-speed approaching stages consume a large portion of energy and their influence on grinding energy cannot be ignored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%