Predictive modelling of brewing fermentation: from knowledge-based to black-box models

Abstract

International audienceAdvanced monitoring, fault detection, automatic control and optimisation of the beer fermentation process require on-line prediction and off-line simulation of key variables. Three dynamic models for the beer fermentation process are proposed and validated in laboratory scale: a model based on biological knowledge of the fermentation process, an empirical model based on the shape of the experimental curves and a black-box model based on an artificial neural network. The models take into account the fermentation temperature, the top pressure and the initial yeast concentration, and predict the wort density, the residual sugar concentration, the ethanol concentration, and the released CO 2. The models were compared in terms of prediction accuracy, robustness and generalisation ability (interpolation and extrapolation), reliability of parameter identification and interpretation of the parameter values. Not surprisingly, in the case of a relatively limited experimental data (10 experiments in various operating conditions), models that include more process knowledge appear equally accurate but more reliable than the neural network. The achieved prediction accuracy was 5% for the released CO 2 volume, 10% for the density and the ethanol concentration and 20% for the residual sugar concentration

Comparing the Impact of Environmental Factors During Very High Gravity Brewing Fermentations

“…The optimization of brewing fermentations has been studied using modelling tools in order to understand variations in the beer profile caused by the process variables 12,18,44,53,54 . In this study, the focus was on the evaluation of the effect of environmental factors such as wort concentration, dissolved oxygen, temperature and yeast pitching rate on the productivity parameters of a brewing fermentation, with an industrial lager brewer's yeast strain, with the application of a full factorial design.…”

Optimal Beer Fermentation

“…Garcia et al 9 present a fusel alcohol model, Garcia et al 10 developed a neural network model for ethyl caproate, de Andres-Toro et al 6 developed a three component biomass model that includes lag phase, active cell and dead cell components. Titica et al 22 present a flavor model based upon prior biological information and an analysis of experimental data, and Trelea et al 23,24 developed models based on biological knowledge, empirical data and artificial neural networks. With limited data they conclude that the fundamental models were superior.…”

On the application of a nature-inspired stochastic evolutionary algorithm to constrained multi-objective beer fermentation optimisation

“…Several mathematical models for the beer fermentation process have been proposed (Gee and Ramirez, 1988;de Andres-Toro, 1998, Trelea et al, 2001. Models are reduced order, considering only the key species present due to system complexity (200+ species, Vanderhaegen et al, 2006) rendering exhaustive modelling extremely cumbersome: in fact to date many of the specific chemical interactions in the fermentation process are not understood…”