1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00051507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive quality of macroinvertebrate ? habitat associations in lower navigation pools of the Mississippi River

Abstract: Macroinvertebrate community structure was compared between habitat types within a navigation pool and between navigation pools of the Upper Mississippi River. Bottom samples were taken using a grab or Wilding sampler from 40 and 14 stations on Pool 19 and 26, respectively. In both Pools, distinct communities developed based on substrate type or the presence of aquatic macrophytes rather than specific habitats as defined by river morphometry. Areas with sand substrates usually had communities of low density and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have examined the distribution of benthic macroinvertebrates in the main channel of a large river : Russian Rivers (Zhadin & Gerd 1961), the River Tisza in Hungary (Ferencz 1974 a, b), the River St Lawrence (Vincent & Vaillancourt 1978), the River Mississippi (Wells & Demas 1979, Andersen & Day 1986, the River Rhône (Gaschignard et al 1983), the River Rhine (Sopp 1983), the River Main (Schleuter & Tittizer 1988). The most obvious differences have been found between the channel and the riparian systems (banks).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have examined the distribution of benthic macroinvertebrates in the main channel of a large river : Russian Rivers (Zhadin & Gerd 1961), the River Tisza in Hungary (Ferencz 1974 a, b), the River St Lawrence (Vincent & Vaillancourt 1978), the River Mississippi (Wells & Demas 1979, Andersen & Day 1986, the River Rhône (Gaschignard et al 1983), the River Rhine (Sopp 1983), the River Main (Schleuter & Tittizer 1988). The most obvious differences have been found between the channel and the riparian systems (banks).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4; unpublished data from three district offices of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). Mean annual navigation traffic on the river declined from 5400 barges in 1980 to less than 3500 barges in and 1986. During 1987, about 4000 barges annually navigated the river.…”
Section: Commercial I~avigation and Dredgingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Musculium transvelwum are filter feeders that are generally most abundant in habitats with low vegetation density and soft. silty-sandy substrates (Carlson, 1968;Gale, 1971Gale, , 1975Anderson & Day, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community structure of phytoplankton and zooplankton is strongly influenced by TSS and connectivity with lentic areas (Wahl et al 2008, Burdis and Hoxmeier 2011, Manier 2014. Current velocity and substrate type within the channel influence the distribution of benthic invertebrates (Fremling 1960, Seagle et al 1982, Anderson and Day 1986, Dettmers et al 2001b, and connectivity with adjacent lentic areas provides important sources of invertebrate drift (Eckblad et al 1984, Sheaffer andNickum 1986b). Hydraulic traps within the river bedform, i.e., sand dunes, support the retention of macroinvertebrate drift (Gutreuter et al 2006) and provide low-velocity refuge and energetic savings for fishes feeding on drift in the main channel (Lehtinen et al 1997, Guensch et al 2001, Wildhaber et al 2003, Gaeuman and Jacobson 2007.…”
Section: Fish Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%