“…Recently, in Caucasian patients with classic or predominantly classic CNV secondary to AMD, Parmeggiani et al 39 documented the presence of significant predictive associations among diverse levels of PDT-V effectiveness and peculiar coagulation-balance SNPs: (1) the carriers of thrombophilic gene variants, directly predisposing to thrombosis through a higher thrombin generation (i.e., FVL-G1691A and FII-G20210A) or indirectly affecting thrombocoagulative functionality via hyperhomocysteinemic activation of endothelial cells and platelets (i.e., MTHFR-C677T), were characterized by a greater possibility of showing a benefit after PDT-V; (2) the PDT-V nonresponders were clearly overrepresented within the carriers of the FXIIIA 185 T-allele, which induces an antithrombophilic diathesis that reduces the fibrin-clot stability. 39 In the present study cluster, treated with PDT-V for occult CNV with no classic component, the same methodological approach was used to investigate these pharmacogenetic predictors, but the results just partially confirm those in the prior study. In fact, considering both classic and occult CNVs, FV-1691AϩFII-20210A and, most of all, FXIIIA-185T covariates seem to be predictive of, respectively, clinical success or failure of PDT-V; whereas higher odds of photodynamic benefit is recordable in classic-CNV patients with MTHFR-C677T mutation, but not in occult-CNV patients with the same SNP.…”