Predictive value of different scoring systems for critically ill patients with hospital acquired pneumonia

Al-Badawy, T; Abouelela, Amr; Kawi, Marwa Abdel Gawad Abdel

doi:10.1016/j.ejcdt.2016.05.010

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It has been demonstrated that almost all the severity scores used for CAP could be also valuable for HAP [45]. A more recent study focused only on the CURB-65 score, named for the risk factors measured (each scoring 1 point): confusion of new onset, urea ⩾7 mmol•L −1 (blood urea nitrogen >19 mg•dL −1 ), respiratory rate ⩾30 breaths per minute, systolic blood pressure (BP) ⩽90 mmHg or diastolic BP ⩽60 mmHg and age ⩾65 years [46].…”

Section: Diagnosismentioning

confidence: 99%

Is ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia a worse entity than ventilator-associated pneumonia?

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionNosocomial pneumonia develops after ≥48 h of hospitalisation and is classified as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP); the latter may require mechanical ventilation (V-HAP) or not (NV-HAP).Main findingsVAP and HAP affect a significant proportion of hospitalised patients and are characterised by poor clinical outcomes. Among them, V-HAP has the greatest 28-day mortality rate followed by VAP and NV-HAP (27.8% versus 18% versus 14.5%, respectively). However, no differences in terms of pathophysiology, underlying microbiological pathways and subsequent therapy have been identified. International guidelines suggest specific flow charts to help clinicians in the therapeutic management of such diseases; however, there are no specific recommendations beyond VAP and HAP classification. HAP subtypes are scarcely considered as different entities and the lack of data from the clinical scenario limits any final conclusion. Hopefully, recent understanding of the pathophysiology of such diseases, as well as the discovery of new therapies, will improve the outcome associated with such pulmonary infections.ConclusionNosocomial pneumonia is a multifaced disease with features of pivotal interest in critical care medicine. Due to the worrisome data on mortality of patients with nosocomial pneumonia, further prospective studies focused on this topic are urgently needed.

show abstract

Section: Diagnosismentioning

confidence: 99%

Is ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia a worse entity than ventilator-associated pneumonia?

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Diagnosis of nonventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia: how much do we know?

Ranzani

Pascale

Park

2018

Current Opinion in Critical Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Ability of the SMART‐COP score to predict the need for intensive care unit admission and mortality in older patients with non–ventilator‐associated hospital‐acquired pneumonia: A retrospective observational study

Kollu,

Yilmaz Kars,

Dogan

et al. 2024

Geriatrics Gerontology Int

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimTo evaluate the ability of SMART‐COP (systolic blood pressure, multilobar infiltrates, albumin, respiratory rate, tachycardia, confusion, oxygen and pH) score to predict the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality among patients with non–ventilator‐associated hospital‐acquired pneumonia (NV‐HAP) and to compare ICU‐hospitalized patients with those followed‐up in the clinic, as well as the patients who survived with those who died in the ICU, in terms of clinical and laboratory parameters.MethodsA total of 203 patients (aged > 65 years) who were diagnosed with NV‐HAP while staying in the geriatric clinic were enrolled in this retrospective observational study. Patient information was retrieved from hospital files.ResultsIn a total of 203 patients with NV‐HAP, the rate of ICU admission was 77.3% and the rate of mortality was 40.9%. The SMART‐COP score was significantly higher in those admitted to the ICU and those died in the ICU (ICU nonsurvivors). The rate of ICU mortality was 52.9%. The SMART‐COP score had significantly poor to moderate ability to predict the need for ICU admission (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.583) and both in‐hospital mortality (AUC = 0.633) and ICU mortality (AUC = 0.617) with low sensitivity. The regression analysis revealed that a one‐unit increase in SMART‐COP score resulted in a 1.2‐fold increase in both the hospital and ICU mortality (P < 0.05 for both) and 1.1‐fold increase in ICU admission (P = 0.154).ConclusionThe SMART‐COP score has poor to moderate ability to predict the need for ICU admission, in‐hospital mortality and ICU mortality, and a one‐unit increase in the SMART‐COP score significantly increases the risk of both hospital and ICU mortality. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; ••: ••–••.

show abstract

Predictive value of different scoring systems for critically ill patients with hospital acquired pneumonia

Cited by 3 publications

References 14 publications

Is ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia a worse entity than ventilator-associated pneumonia?

Is ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia a worse entity than ventilator-associated pneumonia?

Diagnosis of nonventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia: how much do we know?

Ability of the SMART‐COP score to predict the need for intensive care unit admission and mortality in older patients with non–ventilator‐associated hospital‐acquired pneumonia: A retrospective observational study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About