2014
DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2013.853322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictor-based control of linear systems with large and variable measurement delays

Abstract: This paper concerns the problem of the control of linear systems by means of feedback from delayed output, where the delay is known and time-varying. The main advantage of the approach is that it can be applied to systems with any delay bound, i.e. not only small delays. The predictor is based on a combination of finite-dimensional elementary predictors whose number can be suitably chosen to compensate any delay. The single-predictor element is an original proposal, and the class of delays to which the schema … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) The observer (2) is obtained by shifting the plant (1) in time by r and introducing a correcting term. The time-varying injection gain Le −αo(t+r−s k ) will allow to guarantee that the observation error decays with the rate α o [21]. The shape functions b i ∈ L 2 (0, 1) are given by where…”
Section: Plant Description and Observer Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(2) The observer (2) is obtained by shifting the plant (1) in time by r and introducing a correcting term. The time-varying injection gain Le −αo(t+r−s k ) will allow to guarantee that the observation error decays with the rate α o [21]. The shape functions b i ∈ L 2 (0, 1) are given by where…”
Section: Plant Description and Observer Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof: The transformation (16) has an inverse, which is bounded in H 1 norm (see, e.g., [25]). Therefore, there exists a constantC such that ẑ(•, t) H 1≤C w(•, t) H 1 (21) ≤CC w e − min{αo,αc}t z(•, 0) H 1 for t ≥ t 0 . Since z(x, t) =ẑ(x, t − r) −z(x, t), the latter together with (5) imply (22).…”
Section: Using Integration By Parts We Havėmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In practice, this is generally not possible to know the delay value in advance that is why alternative predictive techniques have been developed. In [20], the sub predictor method developed in [21] has been modified and extended to time-varying output and input delays. The advantage of this method is that it is finite dimensional.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%