2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Adolescent Sexual Behavior and Intention: A Theory-Guided Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
342
2
12

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 432 publications
(381 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(166 reference statements)
25
342
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a previously described and validated methodologic quality scoring (MQS) system. 21,22 Scores on the 11-item MQS ranged from 0 to 20. Scores were grouped to denote lower-(score of 0 -6), medium-(score of [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], and higher-(score Ն 15) quality studies.…”
Section: Methodologic Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a previously described and validated methodologic quality scoring (MQS) system. 21,22 Scores on the 11-item MQS ranged from 0 to 20. Scores were grouped to denote lower-(score of 0 -6), medium-(score of [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], and higher-(score Ն 15) quality studies.…”
Section: Methodologic Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some studies have found that parental monitoring during later adolescence serves as a protective factor in relation to HRSB, the current results lend support to researchers who have found conflicting results suggesting that parental monitoring is not associated with HRSB after accounting for other proximal risk factors. 47 Furthermore, some researchers have posited that other aspects of positive parenting are more influential than monitoring 11 in mitigating risk for HRSB. These have included parental warmth, 48 parentchild communication, 49 and relationship quality, 50 which have all been linked to decreased rates of HRSBs.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…45,46 Consequently, not accounting for these time-varying covariates may result in misestimated time parameters for condom use (i.e., rate of change in condom use over time) and a biased estimate of the association between condom use and neighborhood disadvantage.…”
Section: Social Disorganization Theory: a Conceptual Framework To Examentioning
confidence: 99%