2018
DOI: 10.29329/mjer.2018.153.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Counselor-in-Training Students' General Self-Efficacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies conducted after Covid-19 have shown that the pandemic increases the depression and anxiety levels (Wang et al, 2020) of individuals and their suicidal tendencies (Mamun and Griffiths, 2020); and showed that the process produced various negative consequences among healthcare workers, such as burnout (Chen et al, 2020), loneliness (Zandifar and Badrfam, 2020), and sleep disturbances (Huang and Zhao, 2020;Baykal, 2020). Findings in this study were obtained to support the idea that individuals with higher levels of resilience tend to cope with stressful events more successfully than those with lower resilience (Haktanir et al, 2020;Haktanir et al, 2018;Smith et al, 2017). Similarly, Hjemdal et al (2011) stated that individuals with high psychological resilience are less depressed, less stressed about events, and less anxious; as a result, he argues that their life satisfaction levels are higher.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Suggestionssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies conducted after Covid-19 have shown that the pandemic increases the depression and anxiety levels (Wang et al, 2020) of individuals and their suicidal tendencies (Mamun and Griffiths, 2020); and showed that the process produced various negative consequences among healthcare workers, such as burnout (Chen et al, 2020), loneliness (Zandifar and Badrfam, 2020), and sleep disturbances (Huang and Zhao, 2020;Baykal, 2020). Findings in this study were obtained to support the idea that individuals with higher levels of resilience tend to cope with stressful events more successfully than those with lower resilience (Haktanir et al, 2020;Haktanir et al, 2018;Smith et al, 2017). Similarly, Hjemdal et al (2011) stated that individuals with high psychological resilience are less depressed, less stressed about events, and less anxious; as a result, he argues that their life satisfaction levels are higher.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Suggestionssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Sample items in this scale include "It is hard for me to snap back when something bad happens". The scale has indicated acceptable to excellent reliability coefficient values in various studies ranged between 0.78 and 0.91 (Haktanir et al, 2018;Karaman et al, 2018;Smith et al, 2008). The measure had an adequate internal reliability estimate in the present study (.79).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Sample questions include "It is hard for me to snap back when something bad happens". The instrument has shown acceptable to excellent reliability across studies ranging from 0.78 to 0.91 (Haktanir et al, 2018;Karaman et al, 2018;Karaman, et al, 2019;Smith et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Described as how employees evaluate their capacity of doing their work [1], work self-efficacy is considered important because it significantly predicts job security [2] and support at work [3]. While mattering was recently reported to be a robust predictor of work self-efficacy even after controlling for state self-esteem [4][5][6][7], this study aimed to confirm whether the results of the aforementioned studies still hold during the enforcement of working from home (WFH), where employees had to work with limited interaction with their social environment at work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%