2020
DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000000565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Recurrence, and Progression-Free and Overall Survival following Open versus Robotic Radical Cystectomy: Analysis from the RAZOR Trial with a 3-Year Followup

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
45
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The RAZOR trial, which compared RARC and ORC in a randomized controlled trial, found no increase in disseminated recurrences. Although the updated 3‐year follow‐up data of RAZOR trial were published, the observed period was still not enough, and further investigation is required . In addition, the fact that there are different results depending on whether the disseminated recurrence increases after MIRC, the recurrence might be directly related to the surgeon’s skill, and the surgeon should be careful not to cause disseminated recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RAZOR trial, which compared RARC and ORC in a randomized controlled trial, found no increase in disseminated recurrences. Although the updated 3‐year follow‐up data of RAZOR trial were published, the observed period was still not enough, and further investigation is required . In addition, the fact that there are different results depending on whether the disseminated recurrence increases after MIRC, the recurrence might be directly related to the surgeon’s skill, and the surgeon should be careful not to cause disseminated recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the two RCTs that compared the outcomes of RARC and ORC, there were no significant differences in nodal yields and the incidence of pN+ patients (Table 3). 85,86 Local recurrence rates were slightly higher in the RARC group without statistical significance 87,88 . In contrast, in a retrospective study using a large‐scale database, nodal yields were significantly greater in RARC than in ORC (Table 3).…”
Section: Other Relevant Issuesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The RAZOR trial [ 8 ] revealed that RARC was non-inferior to ORC for 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). Its update still showed no difference in recurrence, 3-year PFS and 3-year OS between RARC and ORC [ 25 ]. Bochner et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%