2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of residual pulmonary vascular obstruction after pulmonary embolism: Results from a prospective cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This association was maintained at 6 months, with a discriminant threshold of 14%, which is consistent with the observation of Pesavento et al, although they used an outcome combining recurrent PE and CTEPH 23 . Other studies showed that PVO at PE diagnosis was predictive of recurrent PE, with PVO cutoff of 40% and 20% in patients with a first unprovoked PE and unselected PE, respectively 14,24 . Predictive values of recurrent PE have been also established for residual PVO at 6 months 25 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This association was maintained at 6 months, with a discriminant threshold of 14%, which is consistent with the observation of Pesavento et al, although they used an outcome combining recurrent PE and CTEPH 23 . Other studies showed that PVO at PE diagnosis was predictive of recurrent PE, with PVO cutoff of 40% and 20% in patients with a first unprovoked PE and unselected PE, respectively 14,24 . Predictive values of recurrent PE have been also established for residual PVO at 6 months 25 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…23 Other studies showed that PVO at PE diagnosis was predictive of recurrent PE, with PVO cutoff of 40% and 20% in patients with a first unprovoked PE and unselected PE, respectively. 14,24 Predictive values of recurrent PE have been also established for residual PVO at 6 months. 25 Indeed, recurrent PE is a recognized risk factor for CTEPH, with the hypothesis that undiagnosed recurrent PE might contribute to persistent PVO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of RPVO following an index PE is in keeping with previously reported rates ranging from 19-51.8%. 10,11,14 There is a paucity of data regarding the long-term effects of reperfusion therapies on PE, and the few studies that investigated its impact came to different conclusions. Two small, prospective randomized trials reported that thrombolysis, compared with anticoagulation, might improve functional capacity and the persistence of pulmonary hypertension at long-term follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 In addition, several studies found that RPVO is an independent predictor of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). 10,11 Reperfusion therapies have been shown to improve short-term outcomes by rapidly and effectively reversing the hemodynamic burden that PE imposes on the pulmonary circulation and the right heart. 12 Theoretically, the rapid and effective clot resolution exerted by reperfusion therapies could possibly minimize the development of long-term consequences of PE, including RV dysfunction and CTEPH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with PE or CTEPH, there is a growing interest in quantifying the pulmonary vascular obstruction index (PVOI), i.e., the percentage of the whole lung volume with perfusion defects. Indeed, a high pulmonary vascular obstruction index (PVOI) measured at the time of PE diagnosis was associated with an increased risk of residual obstruction ( 4 , 5 ) and recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) ( 6 , 7 ). Similarly, studies suggest that residual PVOI, when measured with lung scan after a minimum of 3 months of anticoagulant therapy, might be associated with a 2- to 3-fold increased risk of recurrent VTE ( 4 , 8 , 9 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%