“…All the studies applying the CONUT tool to stroke patients were carried out (since 2018) in Far Eastern Countries, with the exception of one from Spain [ 14 , 15 , 17 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 25 , 26 , 30 , 33 , 34 , 36 , 40 , 41 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 56 , 60 , 61 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 ], as reported in Table 1 . Stroke patients were classified according to the original four, but also in three (normal, light, and moderate/severe risk) or in two (absence or presence of risk) categories; a CONUT score ≥5 was commonly defined as the cut-off for a significant risk of malnutrition, but in two papers the cut-off was ≥2 [ 72 ] or ≥4 [ 23 ], respectively.…”