2018
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.21.17211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predominant Washback of the General Secondary English Examination on Teachers

Abstract: General Secondary English Examination (GSEE) is the highest secondary school exit test run by the Ministry of Education, Yemen. Due to the significance of the exam being the foundation of the students’ future, teachers are only preoccupied with how to help students get high marks in this final examination to be eligible to join university. The aim of this study is to investigate the dominant wash back effect of the GSEE on Yemeni teachers who are highly engrossed by the test. The study focuses on four pedagogi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the test quality, teachers were not consulted before the final test was designed, which led to their feeling of humiliation and the thought of discrepancies between the test quality and the students' ability. Tayeb et al (2018) from Yemen was in line with Shohamy (1993) when they reported teachers' bad feeling toward the test because "they were passive when test design, administration and evaluation depends on the High committee of examination" (p.454). In terms of the test status, teachers expressed opposing attitudes toward the Arabic exam, but supports for the EFL exam because the latter could effectively back up students' communicative skills and their future.…”
Section: Washback Of the Test To Teachers' Perceptions Of The Test Anmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…As for the test quality, teachers were not consulted before the final test was designed, which led to their feeling of humiliation and the thought of discrepancies between the test quality and the students' ability. Tayeb et al (2018) from Yemen was in line with Shohamy (1993) when they reported teachers' bad feeling toward the test because "they were passive when test design, administration and evaluation depends on the High committee of examination" (p.454). In terms of the test status, teachers expressed opposing attitudes toward the Arabic exam, but supports for the EFL exam because the latter could effectively back up students' communicative skills and their future.…”
Section: Washback Of the Test To Teachers' Perceptions Of The Test Anmentioning
confidence: 58%