1988
DOI: 10.1080/01614948808071752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preexponential Factors for Elementary Surface Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, in order to reproduce the present experimental results, both the preexponential factor and the activation energy for reaction (4) must be large, while those for reaction (5) must be small. In general, the preexponential factor for the decomposition processes on surfaces, such as reaction (4) [28,29]. The present results could not be reproduced by simulations when these typical parameters were assumed.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, in order to reproduce the present experimental results, both the preexponential factor and the activation energy for reaction (4) must be large, while those for reaction (5) must be small. In general, the preexponential factor for the decomposition processes on surfaces, such as reaction (4) [28,29]. The present results could not be reproduced by simulations when these typical parameters were assumed.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…In general, activation energies depend on the surface coverage [28]. For example, the desorption energy of OH radicals from heated Pd surfaces decrease with the increase in the surface coverage [30,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Zhdanov et al 1988 andDumesic et al 1993) expected for rate coefficients corresponding to the elementary steps (1) to (11) in Table 1.…”
Section: Model Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(25) and (26) suggest that the chemisorption coefficient for an empty surface would amount around 40 s -1, which is somewhere in the middle of the interval proposed by Zhdanow et al [27]. A sticking coefficient So can be calculated from ra = soFco = kcKpCco(1 -Oo -0co) (27) with ra the adsorption rate and Fco the collision flux.…”
Section: Modelling Results and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%