2020
DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6903a1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preexposure Prophylaxis for Prevention of HIV Acquisition Among Adolescents: Clinical Considerations, 2020

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous HIV prevention tools, such as consistent condom use and pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV (PrEP), could address these disproportionate rates but remain underutilized by AYAs [3]. Despite the expanded indication in 2018 for PrEP (tenofovir emtricitabine or TDF/FTC) for anyone weighing at least 35kg (~77lbs), there remain numerous barriers to increasing AYA PrEP use including low PrEP knowledge, challenges adhering to a daily medication, medication costs, HIV-and sex-related stigma, parent and provider concerns, and confidentiality [3][4][5][6]. For instance, demonstration studies among AYAs highlight adherence challenges as only 22% of 15 to 17 year olds were adherent to PrEP over a 48-week period, with adherence declining after visit spacing was increased from monthly to quarterly [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous HIV prevention tools, such as consistent condom use and pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV (PrEP), could address these disproportionate rates but remain underutilized by AYAs [3]. Despite the expanded indication in 2018 for PrEP (tenofovir emtricitabine or TDF/FTC) for anyone weighing at least 35kg (~77lbs), there remain numerous barriers to increasing AYA PrEP use including low PrEP knowledge, challenges adhering to a daily medication, medication costs, HIV-and sex-related stigma, parent and provider concerns, and confidentiality [3][4][5][6]. For instance, demonstration studies among AYAs highlight adherence challenges as only 22% of 15 to 17 year olds were adherent to PrEP over a 48-week period, with adherence declining after visit spacing was increased from monthly to quarterly [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Alabama, AYAs account for 31% of new cases [ 2 ]. Numerous HIV prevention tools, such as consistent condom use and pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV (PrEP), could address these disproportionate rates but remain underutilized by AYAs [ 3 ]. Despite the expanded indication in 2018 for PrEP (tenofovir emtricitabine or TDF/FTC) for anyone weighing at least 35kg (~77lbs), there remain numerous barriers to increasing AYA PrEP use including low PrEP knowledge, challenges adhering to a daily medication, medication costs, HIV- and sex-related stigma, parent and provider concerns, and confidentiality [ 3 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This evidence has resulted in the firm conclusion that treatment is prevention, and that those who maintain an undetectable HIV viral load do not transmit HIV to their sexual partners (i.e., undetectable = untransmittable [U=U]) [ 6 ]. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has also demonstrated impressive results in reducing HIV transmission, with daily oral pill regimens tenofovir disoproxil/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) and tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (TAF/FTC) reducing the risk of HIV acquisition up to 99% with daily adherence, leading to a grade A recommendation from the U.S. Prevention Services Task Force (USPSTF) [ 7 – 11 ]. Emerging technologies, including long-acting injectable PrEP (cabotegravir) awaiting FDA approval, will further augment and diversify prevention modalities and strategies [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PrEP is an effective and safe intervention to prevent HIV [ 6 , 7 ], approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2018 for use by adolescents weighing at least 77 pounds. PrEP could significantly contribute to reducing the HIV burden among ASMM [ 8 ], but little is known about how effective a PrEP program is likely to be for this population [ 9 ]. Previous modeling studies have demonstrated that PrEP use by ASMM can be highly impactful in reducing new infections [ 10 , 11 ] and potentially cost-effective in some subpopulations in high-incidence settings [ 12 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%