Evaluating Learning Algorithms 2011
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511921803.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For their definitions see, e.g. [8,10]. They are estimated in stratified 10-fold cross-validation repeated several times to reduce variance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For their definitions see, e.g. [8,10]. They are estimated in stratified 10-fold cross-validation repeated several times to reduce variance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average values of the sensitivity measure are presented in Table 1. The last row contains averaged ranks calculated as in the Friedman test [10]. The test with post-hoc analysis (the critical difference CD = 1.61) shows that EBBag and RBBag leads to significantly better sensitivity than all other bagging variants.…”
Section: Comparison Of Known Bagging Extensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Wilcoxon signed-rand test is a nonparametric pairwise comparison test with the assumption that the distribution of the difference scores is symmetric about the median. 28 The lower-sided Wilcoxon test is performed with the null hypothesis that the median of the difference scores of the compared two variables is equal to zero, while the alternative hypothesis that the median is less than zero, where the …”
Section: Statistical Significance Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generalization loss 28 at epoch t is defined as the relative increase of the validation error over the minimum so far (in percentage):…”
Section: Appendix a Definitions And Stopping Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were obtained using a k-fold cross-validation strategy (k 5) over the training set. The figure of merit used for the assessment of the classification quality (over the test set) is the Overall Accuracy measure, defined as the total number of correctly classified samples divided by the total number of test samples [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%