Prefectoral Systems and Central?Local Government Relations in Scandinavia

Abstract

As prefectoral systems are generally regarded to be systems that underpin and serve as the basis for centralization, this article examines how they have developed and how they work, and why they are still considered necessary in decentralized Scandinavia. The article finds that the prefect's authority towards the municipalities varies in Scandinavia. The Norwegian and Swedish prefectures hold rather powerful roles, while the Danish ones do not. The article suggests that this may have something to do with the need for an institution that brings about cohesion and coordination. Prefectoral systems are basically pragmatic solutions to the problem of enforcing national standards and common values across regions and municipalities, but their role may vary with institutional conditions created by local government reforms. The article further suggests that the authority of the prefecture varies with the character of central‐local relations, and that it is vulnerable to changes in dominant political goals and values.

Public Perception of the Hungarian Local Government Reform

“…During the research the following literature was used:Dollery et al, 2006;Aaberge & Langorgen, 2006;Agranoff, 2014;Bjørnå & Jenssen, 2006;Bordogna & Neri, 2014;Brackertz, 2013;Bulmer, 2015;Callanan, 2011;Chan, 2019;Chen et al, 2010;Cuadrado-Ballesteros et al, 2013;Dawkins, 2021;Devereux & Weisbrod, 2006;Falleth & Hovik, 2009;Gawłowski & Paweł, 2019;Giannoccaro et al, 2008;Hardell et al, 2020;James, 2011;Kadirbeyoğlu & Sümer, 2012;Kákai, 2019;Keivani et al, 2001;Kudo, 2015;Milán-García et al, 2021;Mina & Surugiu, 2013;Murphy et al, 2011;Narbón-Perpiná & De Witte, 2018;Nurse, 2015;Powell et al, 2019;Reddick et al, 2022;Reid, 2012;Sellers & Lidström, 2007;Suditu et al, 2014;Tamás, 2014;Tarditi, 2020;Vincent-Jones, 2002;Watt, 2006;Wilson, 2003. …”