2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferences for redistribution and exposure to tax-benefit schemes in Europe

Abstract: This paper provides evidence that attitudes towards redistribution are associated with the extent of generosity of the redistributive context experienced by the individual, as measured by the likelihood of receiving positive benefit transfers net of fiscal contribution. We estimate reduced form tax-benefit equations with the EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC), and match the implied parameters to the respondents of the European Social Survey (ESS) on the basis of their characteristics. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, 75% and 52% of respondents were in favour (agreed or strongly agreed) of a 0.5% or 2.0% tax rate, respectively, levied on net wealth in excess of EUR 4 million; but the support fell to 38% when the tax rate is 2% and the exception amount is EUR 2 million. These findings contribute to the literature investigating preferences for redistribution (e.g., Alesina & Giuliano, 2011;Andreoli & Olivera, 2020;Olivera, 2015), particularly to the studies assessing attitudes to tax policy (Stantcheva, 2020;Rowlingson et al, 2021) and feasibility of wealth taxation (Saez & Zucman, 2019;Scheuer & Slemrod, 2021). Closest to our study is the report by Rowlingson et al (2021) measuring attitudes towards the introduction of a wealth tax in the United Kingdom.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…For example, 75% and 52% of respondents were in favour (agreed or strongly agreed) of a 0.5% or 2.0% tax rate, respectively, levied on net wealth in excess of EUR 4 million; but the support fell to 38% when the tax rate is 2% and the exception amount is EUR 2 million. These findings contribute to the literature investigating preferences for redistribution (e.g., Alesina & Giuliano, 2011;Andreoli & Olivera, 2020;Olivera, 2015), particularly to the studies assessing attitudes to tax policy (Stantcheva, 2020;Rowlingson et al, 2021) and feasibility of wealth taxation (Saez & Zucman, 2019;Scheuer & Slemrod, 2021). Closest to our study is the report by Rowlingson et al (2021) measuring attitudes towards the introduction of a wealth tax in the United Kingdom.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Another speech form found in female students' speech towards female teachers was assertive speech. Assertive speech is speech that functions to state the truth of the proposition being expressed (Andreoli & Olivera 2020).…”
Section: Gender Representation In Student Language Politenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings contribute to the literature investigating preferences for redistribution (e.g., Alesina & Giuliano, 2011 ; Andreoli & Olivera, 2020 ; Olivera, 2015 ), particularly to the studies assessing attitudes to tax policy (Stantcheva, 2020 ; Rowlingson et al, 2021 ) and feasibility of wealth taxation (Saez & Zucman, 2019 ; Scheuer & Slemrod, 2021 ). Closest to our study is the report by Rowlingson et al ( 2021 ) measuring attitudes towards the introduction of a wealth tax in the United Kingdom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%