2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferences of 14 rat strains for 17 taste compounds

Abstract: TORDOFF, M.G., L.K. ALARCON AND M.P. LAWLER. Preferences of 14 rat strains for 17 taste compounds. PHYSIOL BEHAV 00(0) 000-000, 2008.--Two-bottle choice tests were used to assess the taste preferences of 8 male and 8 female rats from 3 outbred strains (SD, LE, WI) and 11 inbred strains (BN, BUF, COP, DA, Dahl-S, F344, FHH, LEW, Noble, PVG, SHR). Each rat received a series of 109 48-h tests with a choice between water and a "taste solution". Four to eight concentrations of the following compounds were tested: N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
69
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
7
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taste reactivity tests demonstrate that rats consider ethanol to contain both sweet and bitter components (Kiefer, 1995). Additionally, in taste preference tests, Sprague-Dawley rats show a preference for ethanol compared to water when it is in concentrations of 1-2% but exhibit a robust avoidance of concentrations above 6% (Morrow et al, 1993; Tordoff et al, 2008). The DAMGO results in the present study are consistent with the view that the μ-receptor system in the PVN may stimulate consummatory behavior as a function of taste (Giraudo et al, 1999; Kelley et al, 2002; Woolley et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taste reactivity tests demonstrate that rats consider ethanol to contain both sweet and bitter components (Kiefer, 1995). Additionally, in taste preference tests, Sprague-Dawley rats show a preference for ethanol compared to water when it is in concentrations of 1-2% but exhibit a robust avoidance of concentrations above 6% (Morrow et al, 1993; Tordoff et al, 2008). The DAMGO results in the present study are consistent with the view that the μ-receptor system in the PVN may stimulate consummatory behavior as a function of taste (Giraudo et al, 1999; Kelley et al, 2002; Woolley et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because taste bud precursor patterning, although initiated by β-catenin function, is subsequently regulated by a host of signals acting on a broadly competent epithelium, small changes in their relative signal strengths would be expected to alter taste bud pattern. In fact, in rodents and humans, the number of fungiform taste buds and papillae is highly variable (Bartoshuk et al, 1996;Fischer et al, 2013;Miller, 1988;Miller and Reedy, 1990), and this variability might be functionally important, as taste papilla number may be correlated with differences in taste responses and ultimately influence taste behavior and diet (Bartoshuk et al, 1996;Tordoff et al, 2008).…”
Section: Stabilization Of β-Catenin Within Shhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, calcium-liking appears most prominent in young, growing rats, whereas the rats used here were adults that had largely plateaued in growth. Second, and more critically, calcium-liking is rat strain-specific and it does not include the Wistar strain used here [2]. Thus, a preference for calcium relative to water would not be expected in the subjects of this experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore not surprising that calcium intake is also controlled, and that calcium-replete rats and mice generally avoid calcium solutions at the concentrations that are typically used in psychophysical experiments (i.e., 10 – 300 mM) [1,2]. Restraints on calcium intake prevent large volumes of concentrated calcium from overwhelming homeostatic controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%