Preferences of millennials for a pictorial scale: An opportunity to engage younger generations to participate in research studies

Cabada, Marie Leiner de la; Terrazas, Carmen Patricia Jiménez; Bayardo, Josefa Melgar; Maiyegun, Sitratullah O; Singh, Namrata; Peinado, Jesús

doi:10.22201/fca.24488410e.2018.984

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the other hand, they are a more effective means of representing and conveying a meaning that helps schoolchildren of these ages to give a response (D€ oring et al, 2010). Likewise, previous studies revealed their preferences for a pictorial scale because they consider it friendlier, clearer and faster to complete (De La Cabada et al, 2017).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 77%

Is It Possible to Measure the Role of the Bystander and the Victim of Bullying in Children? Construct Validity of Two Brief Pictorial Scales With IRT and CFA Models

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study's objective was to develop and validate the psychometric properties of two brief pictorial scales to evaluate the roles of bystanders and victims of bullying. A sample of 910 students was considered (49.6%, boys; 50.4%, girls) between the ages of 7 and 13 (M = 10, SD = 1.4). Both instruments present nine pictorial items representing two dimensions: physical bullying (items 1 to 4) and psychological bullying (items 5 to 9). An additional measure of anxiety was used to assess convergent validity. The Confirmatory Factorial Analysis shows that the two-dimensional oblique model, physical bullying and psychological bullying, presents a better fit to the bystander scale data (RMSEA = .040; CFI = .984; SRMR = .033) and in the victim scale (RMSEA = .051; CFI = .978; SRMR = .040) in comparison to other competitor models. From the perspective of the Item Response Theory (IRT), it was found that the items adequately discriminate the levels of the latent variable; therefore, items 1 (physical bullying) and 7 (psychological bullying) are the most accurate on the bystander scale, and items 3 (physical bullying) and 7 (psychological bullying), on the victim scale. It was also found that the degree of difficulty on both scales is lower for the psychological bullying dimension than for the physical bullying dimension. Both instruments demonstrated good psychometric properties; therefore, they can detect school bullying in classrooms.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 77%

Is It Possible to Measure the Role of the Bystander and the Victim of Bullying in Children? Construct Validity of Two Brief Pictorial Scales With IRT and CFA Models

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Preferences of millennials for a pictorial scale: An opportunity to engage younger generations to participate in research studies

Abstract: Preferencias de millennials por una escala con pictogramas: una oportunidad para interesar a jóvenes a participar en investigaciones

Cited by 1 publication

References 48 publications

Is It Possible to Measure the Role of the Bystander and the Victim of Bullying in Children? Construct Validity of Two Brief Pictorial Scales With IRT and CFA Models

Is It Possible to Measure the Role of the Bystander and the Victim of Bullying in Children? Construct Validity of Two Brief Pictorial Scales With IRT and CFA Models

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About