2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferences of Patients and At-risk Individuals for Preventive Approaches to Rheumatoid Arthritis

Abstract: Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another consideration is that individuals who seek clinical care for joint symptoms and are found to be in a pre-RA state may be more interested in participating in a prevention trial than someone who is at risk but is asymptomatic and/or has little understanding of what RA is-which may be the type of individual identified if broad population-based screening for RA risk was implemented. Informing these issues to some extent, there are studies that have explored "preferences" for prevention in at-risk individuals (64,65). General themes that have emerged include that at-risk individuals would like clarity around what RA is as a disease, their absolute risk of IA/RA, and to know that interventions are highly likely to | 189 be successful as well as well-tolerated and safe.…”
Section: Prevention Trial Design and Duration Of Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another consideration is that individuals who seek clinical care for joint symptoms and are found to be in a pre-RA state may be more interested in participating in a prevention trial than someone who is at risk but is asymptomatic and/or has little understanding of what RA is-which may be the type of individual identified if broad population-based screening for RA risk was implemented. Informing these issues to some extent, there are studies that have explored "preferences" for prevention in at-risk individuals (64,65). General themes that have emerged include that at-risk individuals would like clarity around what RA is as a disease, their absolute risk of IA/RA, and to know that interventions are highly likely to | 189 be successful as well as well-tolerated and safe.…”
Section: Prevention Trial Design and Duration Of Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These individuals present with symptoms of arthralgia and positivity for circulatory autoantibodies (such as anti‐citrullinated protein antibodies [ACPA] or rheumatoid factor [RF]), yet have no clinical signs of inflammation 6 . It is now well established that autoantibodies can precede the onset of clinical symptoms by years in RA patients, 7 thus studying these ‘individuals at risk’ (IAR) may provide important clues in understanding the evolution of RA, and in identifying altered immune responses that may predict disease onset 8 . Although arthralgia along with autoantibody positivity greatly increases the risk of development of RA, reported conversion rates vary between 30 and 70% 9,10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 It is now well established that autoantibodies can precede the onset of clinical symptoms by years in RA patients, 7 thus studying these 'individuals at risk' (IAR) may provide important clues in understanding the evolution of RA, and in identifying altered immune responses that may predict disease onset. 8 Although arthralgia along with autoantibody positivity greatly increases the risk of development of RA, reported conversion rates vary between 30 and 70%. 9,10 Furthermore, blood or tissue biomarkers have not yet been identified in this 'at risk' population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases, understanding the perspectives of patients and caregivers for screening and preventive treatments is important for determining a potential disease management strategy. Studies on preferences for preventive and risk-reducing treatments have been conducted, for example, in individuals at risk of rheumatoid arthritis, 26 , 27 women with the BRCA1/2 gene, 28 and individuals at risk of Alzheimer's disease. 29 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%