Human progesterone receptor (PR) exists as two isoforms, A and B. These isoforms are encoded by separate mRNAs which are transcribed from two distinct promoters, both of which are under estrogen control.1, 2) PRA and PRB are both expressed in progesterone target tissues at comparable levels. The ratio of PRA:PRB has been suggested to influence the biological actions of progesterone. Therefore, investigating the relative ratio of PR isoforms in progesterone-responsive tissues may provide important insights into the physiology and perhaps pathogenesis relating to progesterone-mediated actions.In human breast cancer cells, PRA over-expression has been reported to be associated with an alteration in adhesive properties.3) Previous studies using immunoblot analysis have demonstrated very high levels of PRA (up to 100 fold higher than PRB) in a subset of human breast tumors.4) However, immunolocalization of PR isoform proteins has not been reported in detail in human breast cancer. Therefore, in this study, we first immunolocalized PRA and PRB in human breast cancer and intraductal epithelial proliferative lesions. We then examined the mRNAs for PRA and PRB in invasive ductal carcinoma cases using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. We also examined the correlation between these findings and clinicopathological factors of invasive ductal carcinoma including estrogen receptor (ER) α status, Ki67 labeling index (LI), histological grades, and lymph node status, in order to further characterize the biological significance of these PR isoforms in breast carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODSCases Surgical pathology specimens were retrieved from the pathology files of Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Kawasaki University Hospital, Kurashiki, and Tohoku Kosai Hospital, Sendai. These specimens included 47 cases of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), 40 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 27 cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), and 27 cases of proliferative disease without atypia (PDWA) including moderate and florid hyperplasia of the usual type. Pathological diagnosis was based on the work of Dupont et al. 5) and of Ottesen et al.
6)Classification of DCIS was based on the Consensus Conference on the Classification of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in 1997. 7) Non-pathological breast tissues were available for examination in 13, 12 and 12 cases of DCIS, ADH and PDWA, respectively. All of these specimens were fixed in