2017
DOI: 10.1177/0022022117698039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferred Interpersonal Distances: A Global Comparison

Abstract: The version presented here may differ from the published version or, version of record, if you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the 'permanent WRAP url' above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

14
293
0
11

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 344 publications
(339 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
14
293
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Experiment 2 demonstrated that when these norms are violated by a motionless humanoid robot, participants will distance themselves further away from the robot. Note, however, that cultural factors can impact proxemics (Sorokowska, Sorokowski, Hilper, Cantarero, & Frackowiak, 2017), and the only demographic information collected from participants in this study was their age and gender.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Experiment 2 demonstrated that when these norms are violated by a motionless humanoid robot, participants will distance themselves further away from the robot. Note, however, that cultural factors can impact proxemics (Sorokowska, Sorokowski, Hilper, Cantarero, & Frackowiak, 2017), and the only demographic information collected from participants in this study was their age and gender.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the average distance between Asians is larger than between Caucasians, Mediterraneans, and Latinos . The study by Sorokowska also showed that interpersonal distance in China is larger than in the US and many European countries …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Sorokowska et al found the average interpersonal distance in China to be 0.79 m, based on 119 questionnaire samples. This is 18% larger than that obtained in our study, and it is very likely that interpersonal distance will be influenced by type of indoor environment and participant characteristics, such as occupation and personality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This way, the authors could evaluate the projected metric distance for (a) social distance, (b) personal distance, and (c) intimate distance. The number of countries assessed in the study of Sorokowska et al promotes conclusions from different cultures and indicated some new possible categorization of the cultures and to design objects or implement changes in the real world.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%