Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: A standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study

Keeser, Daniel; Padberg, Frank; Reisinger, Eva; Pogarell, Oliver; Kirsch, V.; Palm, Ulrich; Karch, Susanne; Möller, Hans‐Jürgen; Nitsche, Michael A.; Mulert, Christoph

doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.004

Cited by 255 publications

(190 citation statements)

References 98 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

162

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Regarding blinding, half of the studies were double-blinded (Barr et al, 2013;Gaudeau-Bosma et al, 2012;Guse et al, 2013;Keeser et al, 2013;Oliveira et al, 2013;Teo et al, 2011) and the other half were double single-blinded, i.e., the subject and the evaluator were blinded to the allocation group, but not the person applying the stimulation. The time period between stimulation conditions ranged from at least one hour to more than one week (Mulquiney, Hoy, Daskalakis, & Fitzgerald, 2011).…”

Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Psychiatric patients were screened using standard questionnaires and/or psychiatric interviews. Only some studies reported that healthy volunteers were not on medication that could affect the central nervous system (Keeser et al, 2013;Mylius et al, 2012), but these subjects were, in most studies, screened to exclude a psychiatric diagnosis (Esslinger et al, 2012;GaudeauBosma et al, 2012;Keeser et al, 2013;Teo et al, 2011). Importantly, tDCS studies enrolled more healthy volunteers and rTMS, more neuropsychiatric patients.…”

Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Working memory improvement with non-invasive brain stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Brunoni

Vanderhasselt

2014

Brain and Cognition

567

411

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent studies have used non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), to increase dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) activity and, consequently, working memory (WM) performance.. However, such experiments have yielded mixed results, possibly due to small sample sizes and heterogeneity of outcomes. Therefore, our aim was to perform a systematic review and metaanalyses on NIBS studies assessing the n-back task, which is a reliable index for WM. From the first data available to February 2013, we looked for sham-controlled, randomized studies that used NIBS over the DLPFC using the n-back task in PubMed/MEDLINE and other databases. Twelve studies (describing 33 experiments) matched our eligibility criteria. Active vs. sham NIBS was significantly associated with faster response times (RT), higher percentage of correct responses and lower percentage of error responses. However, meta-regressions showed that tDCS (vs. rTMS) presented an improvement only in RT. This could have occurred in part because almost all tDCS studies employed a crossover design (possibly more employed in tDCS over rTMS due to the reliable tDCS blinding) -this factor (study design) was also associated with no improvement in correct responses in the active vs. sham groups. To conclude, rTMS over the DLPFC significantly improved all measures of WM performance whereas tDCS significantly improved RT, but not the percentage of correct and error responses. Mechanistic insights on the role of DLPFC in WM are further discussed, as well as how NIBS techniques could be used in neuropsychiatric samples presenting WM deficits, such as major depression, dementia and schizophrenia.

show abstract

Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Working memory improvement with non-invasive brain stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Brunoni

Vanderhasselt

2014

Brain and Cognition

567

411

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Like in rTMS, two opposite effects can be obtained: cathodal stimulation inhibits neuronal firing, whereas anodal stimulation increases it. In healthy volunteers, tDCS is able to modulate resting EEG and event-related potentials [105], and functional connectivity of corticostriatal and thalamocortical circuits [106], which is of particular interest for migraine that may be associated with thalamocortical dysrhythmia (see Sect. 4) [107].…”

Section: Central Neurostimulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Diagnosis, pathophysiology and management of chronic migraine: a proposal of the Belgian Headache Society

Paemeleire

Louis²,

Magis

et al. 2014

Acta Neurol Belg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Chronic migraine (CM) is a disabling neurological condition affecting 0.5-2 % of the population. In the current third edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders, medication overuse is no longer an exclusion criterion and CM is diagnosed in patients suffering from at least 15 headache days per month of which at least eight are related to migraine. CM is difficult to treat, and preventive treatment options are limited. We provide a pathogenetic model for CM, integrating the latest findings from neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies. On behalf of the Belgian Headache Society, we present a management algorithm for CM based on the international literature and adapted to the Belgian situation. Pharmacological treatment options are discussed, and recent data on transcranial and invasive neuromodulation studies in CM are reviewed. An integrated multimodal treatment programme may be beneficial to refractory patients, but at present, this approach is only supported by a limited number of observational studies and quite variable between centres

show abstract

“…Similarly, DBS can reverse hippocampal information processing deficits among in animals with a variety of developmental manipulations thought to model schizophrenia (Ewing and Grace, 2013;Klein et al, 2013;Perez et al, 2013). In humans, transcranial direct current stimulation has been used to induce changes in brain activity, suggesting that non-pharmacological approaches may also have promise in treating the abnormal underlying brain rhythms in the disorder (Zaehle et al, 2010(Zaehle et al, , 2011a(Zaehle et al, , 2011bKeeser et al, 2011;Jacobson et al, 2012). Patients are shown in blue and controls in red.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cellular and Circuit Models of Increased Resting State Network Gamma Activity in Schizophrenia

White

Siegel

2016

The Neurobiology of Schizophrenia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: A standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study

Cited by 255 publications

References 98 publications

Working memory improvement with non-invasive brain stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Working memory improvement with non-invasive brain stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Diagnosis, pathophysiology and management of chronic migraine: a proposal of the Belgian Headache Society

Cellular and Circuit Models of Increased Resting State Network Gamma Activity in Schizophrenia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About