2020
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pregnancy at 40 years Old and Above: Obstetrical, Fetal, and Neonatal Outcomes. Is Age an Independent Risk Factor for Those Complications?

Abstract: Objectives: Maternal age has been increasing for several decades with many of these late pregnancies between 40 and 45 years old. The main objective of this study is to assess whether maternal age is an independent factor of obstetric, fetal, and neonatal complications. Patients and methods: A monocentric, French study "exposed-unexposed" was conducted during 11 years in a maternity level IIB. Maternal and perinatal outcomes were studied using univariates and multivariate analysis. We compared women aged 40 an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have analyzed the impact of aging on obstetric and perinatal outcome among women with AMA/vAMA (19,21,27,47,48). Yet, data about AMA and outcome of VPT neonates remains sparse (24)(25)(26)28) and contradictory, as some studies report favorable outcomes for VPT infants born to AMA/vAMA mothers (49) and others less favorable outcomes (17). The large amount of heterogeneity among most studies and the neonatal outcomes that were investigated suggest that those results must be interpreted with caution (15,50).…”
Section: Results In the Context Of What Is Knownmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies have analyzed the impact of aging on obstetric and perinatal outcome among women with AMA/vAMA (19,21,27,47,48). Yet, data about AMA and outcome of VPT neonates remains sparse (24)(25)(26)28) and contradictory, as some studies report favorable outcomes for VPT infants born to AMA/vAMA mothers (49) and others less favorable outcomes (17). The large amount of heterogeneity among most studies and the neonatal outcomes that were investigated suggest that those results must be interpreted with caution (15,50).…”
Section: Results In the Context Of What Is Knownmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have explored advanced and very advanced maternal age (AMA/vAMA), in association with pregnancyrelated morbidities (15) and mode of obstetric interventions (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) and large cohort studies have analyzed data of term newborns (21). However, studies of the outcomes of very preterm infants born to mothers of AMA/vAMA remain sparse (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28). An important aim of combined obstetric and neonatal care is to reduce morbidities and improve neonatal outcome by addressing risk factors (20,29).…”
Section: Introduction Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another critical aspect that is becoming obvious is related to the increasing maternal age, and the fact that the cut-off value of 35 y will probably be modified towards higher ages. In the latest INSEE report from France, it was stated that approximately 5% of women who give birth are at least 40 y old, hence the idea of pushing the limit for advanced maternal age to 43–45 y old [ 211 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other eligibility criteria are designed to select the population of interest while excluding women at high risk for adverse pregnancy and infant outcomes, which could interfere with data interpretation or study compliance. Women must be 18-40 years, inclusive, at screening, since advanced maternal age is associated with higher rates of maternal and foetal complications (Bouzaglou et al 2020). Women with a history of adverse obstetric or gynaecological conditions (e.g., preterm birth, spontaneous abortion after the first trimester, stillbirth, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, etc.)…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%