AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum 2020
DOI: 10.2514/6.2020-1301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary Design of a TE Morphing Surface for Rotorcraft

Abstract: This paper presents an overview of the preliminary design process and findings aimed at morphing of trailing edge (TE) control surfaces for rotorcraft. A design methodology for a camber morphing control surface is presented, although twist can also be induced by applying differential camber of the morphing section span. The concept investigated relies on utilizing conventional aircraft structures and materials for morphing purposes; thus, in essence, has the potential to fulfil the conflicting requirements of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RF estimated numerically serves as the maximum force required by the actuator to deflect the flap based on the worst-case load scenario. It must be noted that when the aerodynamic force is also considered, its effect is included either by calculating the flap hinge moment [30] or by transferring the forces from the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations to the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) [31].…”
Section: Flap Skin Design and Actuator Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RF estimated numerically serves as the maximum force required by the actuator to deflect the flap based on the worst-case load scenario. It must be noted that when the aerodynamic force is also considered, its effect is included either by calculating the flap hinge moment [30] or by transferring the forces from the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations to the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) [31].…”
Section: Flap Skin Design and Actuator Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Room, weight, and shape constraints are really hard to meet with traditional technology, even considering the necessity connected to the cabling, installation, maintenance, and so on. It should be noted that the literature is rich with examples that target the blade morphing through non-monolithic devices, originally conceived and deployed [11][12][13]. It is clear that devices with minimal intrusiveness, easiness of command, and with the capability of addressing load-bearing issues, maybe substituting original elements, would be very suitable for that scope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%