2020
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2020.2970145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary Design of DEMO PF Coils Based on EU DEMO 2018 Baseline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 3D electromagnetic model is made of the three main DEMO magnet systems and also includes an equivalent coil for an ideal plasma wire, as shown in Figure 4a,b. The dimensions and positions used to create the magnet domains are taken from [7,8]. The geometry is built entirely in the APDL environment of Ansys software, with a parametric script to rapidly deal with changes in the structures and to split the domain into different component sub-domains to be able to produce a mapped mesh.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Calculation Methodology-ems Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 3D electromagnetic model is made of the three main DEMO magnet systems and also includes an equivalent coil for an ideal plasma wire, as shown in Figure 4a,b. The dimensions and positions used to create the magnet domains are taken from [7,8]. The geometry is built entirely in the APDL environment of Ansys software, with a parametric script to rapidly deal with changes in the structures and to split the domain into different component sub-domains to be able to produce a mapped mesh.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Calculation Methodology-ems Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In DEMO, shown in Figure 1, the toroidal field configuration is obtained with sixteen D-shaped magnets (TF) [5], the vertical field by six poloidal annular coils (PF) [6,7] and the primary transformer circuit by one central solenoid (CS), formed by a stack of five independent modules [8]. Each magnet system in DEMO includes superconductive coils made of Cable-In-Circuit Conductors (CICC) [9].…”
Section: Demo: the Design And The Rationale Behindmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also the two design options [28,34] of the PF coils have been updated according to the 2018 DEMO reference. It turned out that two of the PF coils, namely PF1 and PF6 cannot be reasonably made of NbTi due to the peak field close to 7 T and requested design T cs exceeding 6 K (a temperature margin of 1.5 K is required on top of the inlet temperature of 4.5 K).…”
Section: Pf Coilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It turned out that two of the PF coils, namely PF1 and PF6 cannot be reasonably made of NbTi due to the peak field close to 7 T and requested design T cs exceeding 6 K (a temperature margin of 1.5 K is required on top of the inlet temperature of 4.5 K). Unless a different operating scenario for the PF coils is found, PF1 and PF6 coils will have to be made of Nb 3 Sn as outlined in [34]. Also in the case of the PF coils the fatigue stress is driving the coil mechanical design.…”
Section: Pf Coilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design proposed by the Swiss Plasma Center (SPC) in 2018 satisfied the 19.6 MA plasma current scenario [3]. In 2019, a preliminary design was proposed for the newly available 17.86 MA plasma current scenario [4]. The design was based on coil currents in three different plasma states: Premagnetisation (PREMAG), Start Of Flattop (SOF), and End Of Flattop (EOF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%