“…We now know that marine diazotrophs are diverse and include unicellular cyanobacteria as well as noncyanobacterial diazotrophs that occupy a wider range of marine habitats than previously thought (Berthelot et al, 2017;Bombar et al, 2016;Messer et al, 2016;Moisander et al, 2010;Rees et al, 2009;Zehr & Turner, 2001), but we know little about their physiological capabilities and environmental controls on their biogeography. High N 2 fixation rates have now been measured during summer in temperate northwestern Atlantic and Pacific coastal waters when dissolved N concentrations in surface water were seasonally depleted (Mulholland et al, 2012;Shiozaki et al, 2015), in temperate and tropical coastal systems (Cassar et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2014;Grosse et al, 2010;Larsson et al, 2001;Moisander et al, 2010;Mulholland et al, 2012;Rees et al, 2009;Shiozaki et al, 2015;Voss et al, 2006;Zhang et al, 2012), in nutrient-rich coastal upwelling systems (Voss et al, 2004;Wen et al, 2017), and in coastal Arctic Seas (Blais et al, 2012;Harding et al, 2018;Sipler et al, 2017), broadening the latitudinal range and the diversity of habitats supporting diazotrophy. Based on their phylogenetic affiliations and the lack of quantifiable N 2 fixation rates, the high nifH gene diversity and presence of diverse bacterial diazotroph groups in coastal systems were attributed to microorganisms being transported there from terrestrial systems or sediments, rather than to autochthonous populations of active planktonic diazotrophs (Jenkins et al, 2004;Zehr et al, 2003).…”