2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary interpretation of shaking-table response of a full-scale 3-storey building composed of thin reinforced concrete sandwich walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, there is a sandwich concrete wall whose middle layer is a polystyrene sheet, and is sprayed with thin concrete layers on its surface during construction [30]. Ricci et al [31] found that the seismic performance of this structure was comparable to that of cast-in-place concrete, and the stiffness and the strength of the building made of such material under dynamic excitation appears quite superior with respect to those expected from the results of previous pseudo-static cyclic tests conducted on simple specimens [32][33][34][35]. Another superimposed concrete wall is made of prefabricated wall panels and cast-in-place components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…For example, there is a sandwich concrete wall whose middle layer is a polystyrene sheet, and is sprayed with thin concrete layers on its surface during construction [30]. Ricci et al [31] found that the seismic performance of this structure was comparable to that of cast-in-place concrete, and the stiffness and the strength of the building made of such material under dynamic excitation appears quite superior with respect to those expected from the results of previous pseudo-static cyclic tests conducted on simple specimens [32][33][34][35]. Another superimposed concrete wall is made of prefabricated wall panels and cast-in-place components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The shaking-table tests performed on the full-scale 3-storey building evidenced that the prototype building was able to sustain increasing levels of peak ground acceleration (PGA) up to 1.2 g without visible damages (Ricci et al, 2013;Palermo et al, 2014). More in detail, the results of the tests showed that:…”
Section: Seismic Behavior Of Rc Sandwich Walls: Summary Of Past Studiesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…eir applications have been limited by the internal structural defects in the fabrication and difficulties associated with filling of abnormally shaped composite parts. Recently, the fabrication of composite structures using metal hollow spheres [3,4] and aluminum foam elements with APM [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] has become a hot topic of research. e APM element is an aluminum foam sphere with a closed-pore structure of 2-15 mm diameter and a complete nearlyspherical surface, which can be prepared by the modified powder-compacting foaming (PCF) method [2,5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%